Re: [ietf-smtp] DSNs

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sat, 25 April 2020 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3E03A0BF8 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=i4NGM5ej; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=Ib99MHQ6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjchalBEQD_G for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FEC3A0BF3 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F31DF80277; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:38:51 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1587854331; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : from; bh=CxU4An1PUVbV9jrxlXwatP3z8S3WVXxu5VUK2XNVgcE=; b=i4NGM5ejtgS6NKFmaMvBwN2N0AdpDzP7GeqhTNatIYyXFz6+3ksSZmLMLfIZ4tFJLpbE/ fGeM54Q0jm+u8CjAQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1587854330; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : from; bh=CxU4An1PUVbV9jrxlXwatP3z8S3WVXxu5VUK2XNVgcE=; b=Ib99MHQ6btZv8nzu6+vS7s/lCQhS8JHZbBAYtAvt09QywCuzwfTSQPkGypda/ED+KzkfO ljywiA2xaVzA3n07E8zOKO2HE8vRetJgLFxCDXuuOOrfdDw3fw3hwWjED0qD/bnqQGewmHD BAmF8yIeleu3usWobcKffmWhJxHCBQjhYZvhhnZhegWwJxISdstrNSh9yM5c2JkGnedheF4 lYdHb8l3f1Lr+eMJBuOdUYoE0mrJ060SOnDKUayD9/dx2bTsBDDGCCf1pZ3nBfDfbSyI+C/ OZQmBhraSne8GpA/Of+2oBClqgMw0o5KK8rcr2ceeCLQOND0uZgJAN2R4l0w==
Received: from [192.168.1.184] (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C74BCF800E7; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:38:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 22:38:48 +0000
In-Reply-To: <6db98300-113e-b923-ca1a-c731376ff664@wizmail.org>
References: <20200409230011.F039B17637D0@ary.qy> <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2004091945050.80689@ary.qy> <20200410090430.GA75736@kiel.esmtp.org> <29104A0F-B9ED-4CD7-99B3-5A042375C68B@dukhovni.org> <r7fq4k$1nm5$1@gal.iecc.com> <C1A5FAAA942E0F363CA177C0@PSB> <20200425013624.GV41308@straasha.imrryr.org> <01RK47G4QUK0000058@mauve.mrochek.com> <22e05a3b-bf47-9d83-a340-720ca9a373c4@dcrocker.net> <01RK4LP3NYJK000058@mauve.mrochek.com> <21987cb0-1cc2-e5ce-363f-5bb713333e8e@dcrocker.net> <6db98300-113e-b923-ca1a-c731376ff664@wizmail.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Message-ID: <E1493FB6-113E-46B9-A697-5CCEB60DFB3F@kitterman.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/nu_o5DRZGRzhKfdDKhiIhdDpSzI>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] DSNs
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 22:38:54 -0000


On April 25, 2020 9:52:36 PM UTC, Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> wrote:
>On 25/04/2020 22:46, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>   It's presence in the specification now creates
>> a misunderstanding about what is needed in the working Internet.
>
>Can the specification not support uses that are not Internet-wide,
>such as within an ADMD?
>
>I think there's a useful distinction to be made between protocol
>and profiles.

Is this something an applicability statement would be appropriate for?

Scott K