IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] SMTP, DSNs, and enhanced replies

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 09 April 2020 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020B13A1420 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=S1rFAzgU; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Gc6MWtbh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1r06kryvLdql for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421EB3A141C for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8818 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2020 23:45:40 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=2270.5e8fb3a4.k2004; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=qblaX7yIfJzi+cP/5q3G3CqckJTftlZtNzPqY1/+Inc=; b=S1rFAzgU3661Qnr3DgxcXCnhYBIg0oVqDyn1MwqxCvvVM8J6ogCUOTyj2JoPFBFsHPT0pb+jaF0c0xvIe5PXpuUrjwuU26bKU20kz3E4bqyAcaMmUGlhZ6aVvsJvv1xyp7WzMJRxH+srJXGa7BNAhzoc1raOmwBtiCd5/UMmdzHcQ8FacWwIWVRzIV5YTJlWO8TAX3Du3ZTA+1AqeZbNuWM8BqM8mylknK9wvBByoIWTYzJT3WqdUf3q1wPQ7vlQ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=2270.5e8fb3a4.k2004; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=qblaX7yIfJzi+cP/5q3G3CqckJTftlZtNzPqY1/+Inc=; b=Gc6MWtbhDsI7edD9eOkNgWjrG/JEOmnwBm7L0fomJbW6nxPb/xP+K1cSD9dcFfIvL2/wniMjySfw5FI4HNigQg7Crz5RQpz9YsiHd2ahFh1rpVTimBbdPgRmH2fgR3KUTDey/cQmLv0u7+McF2dCy/3oVBSGEW7NGUBZ7hEAUVge07OmK8bbpOve0ZuAYp2buw+1Nf5+E3l6iJ1r9nD6oLUOg2mxQUkSr7fuPZa9+gInnodUMBxJUbw7Ze+p2NFx
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 09 Apr 2020 23:45:40 -0000
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 19:45:40 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2004091945050.80689@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <693d848e-3a83-c1c8-f806-a129a0ab2713@dcrocker.net>
References: <20200409230011.F039B17637D0@ary.qy> <693d848e-3a83-c1c8-f806-a129a0ab2713@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (OSX 407 2020-02-09)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/wVl_YQlKLaJtVc4UViXhFyWX0u8>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] SMTP, DSNs, and enhanced replies
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 23:45:51 -0000

> Right.  I thinking of the SMTP mechanism for a client's /requesting/ its use, 
> which as far as I has not gained widespread use.

Oh, RFC 3461.  Agreed, it's basically an SMTP level web bug.  Nobody 
implements that.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email