Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 23 July 2020 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9793A07FB; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R_OQNDYAx3KA; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD153A07FC; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 06N2MBAr006411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:22:12 -0700
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: e sam <e2009=40hey.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: ietf-smtp <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
References: <55e6444aa46a9f28a13bddba70a015c00ada6cd3@hey.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <a7d40190-7bb8-4fd7-1717-1c039b08def5@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:19:33 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55e6444aa46a9f28a13bddba70a015c00ada6cd3@hey.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ai1z9k_2jGeE-Cw1xAqJvvIBagU>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 02:19:43 -0000

On 7/22/2020 7:05 PM, e sam wrote:
> I'm just talking about if there IS a problem, which I don't know if 
> there is or isn't one..


For an effort of the narrow type intended here, when someone posts about 
a problem, they should include documentation that it is actually a problem.

It's easy to hypothesize about an infinite range of possibilities.  It 
takes work to document the realities.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net