Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard

"John Levine" <> Tue, 24 January 2017 02:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C310129536 for <>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:02:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yblLhOCSMTa7 for <>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CBC1294A3 for <>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 96515 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2017 02:02:00 -0000
Received: from unknown ( by with QMQP; 24 Jan 2017 02:02:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:01:38 -0000
Message-ID: <20170124020138.65213.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:02:04 -0000

In article <> you write:
>> I think this needs to be discussed a bit more in the LAMPS WG, but you have a good point here.
>I would extend to 'starting in "XX--" where X can be any ascii character" because who knows whether we need a
>completely different prefix one day.

I hope you mean X can be any ascii letter or digit.  After all, Ctrl/C is an ASCII character.

>Or you should explicitly note that ascii-only mailboxes do imply the literal value and those strings MUST NOT
>be interpreted as A-Labels.

Urrgh.  As far as I know, this is an entirely valid ASCII address:

That domain name happens to be the A-label for exá but so what?