IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 17 May 2018 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7019D126B6E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lcnUD1toMUB2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ECD81270B4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id e80-v6so5116573oig.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=hTBJLsplOuA39C4noC2JWqrsVe5AEpnr90/lBex6p9s=; b=MSDZ+f7lyYIlJdO245KjlPK7ENLebaMKYAkxE+iGpfcOu1FA+YnUWM+D7FP0+f2WEt /ZyuPulHuHjgpCXg9M/PJMHwYvn/3du50g8yfJWuyPHguFK6KwPAV+26GCZLiJVJdwRO vFyc18qumpl6fzJ8GcIffw7ZVuL2/kTrzgy+D13Pcl6No7qLPE4om44oFdtZeGaCG1RF Ih2cNlBt5ZLz313tR19mmNLUEI1EvoGBQYaSAwbcHpiVFGha/q8COC12L9ZpI8BDkuCc wditEQ8e4J7Qi6zWUxi89TSxAcxHBLaKOT6T7IB9e8ayQcxl25eB8HnQQKdePGsKYxs1 aTwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hTBJLsplOuA39C4noC2JWqrsVe5AEpnr90/lBex6p9s=; b=W2C9hs3LICTV7qkaWxhBx7hD0Hc/UNFqEfgRaray7E+e3TvRVarnFgAchs5mCwnoHw qfQZ1lRHlSOgME7PEIYhe/SXPOyhCWo2CBA4CkeID3fL1C7UhjbNqf+47aqoJjrA49C2 ZIhduU9wkVjZSAovsI1A5Ul13772rno1JtQ49HVgZmzB8m9+bpq66+aAE08WBuAG7uBR 6iDV3cnucbwfw5M3D9JE+aVaLsX4kNsKJNx+NiyGBvg9QQ2sTEDpSFSuMTDdx7PqSRDH jPS8DGYiaL7hAlQDYbSdSBKl4ZAww89//9fbAoB9LA1+VwqU2BoARC5ysJq5ffsihY4i Y6SQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweBQuXh66jHS3w50uw1iglRKRnD5mahaq8EHsR7jJRaXfUghGWD t9SLOrnzB3pljS4pVDBNabx54M7DqYFoqlBaPcQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZokbSV7xTaPFnZdG3LqKyF7ozatQEaWeqVoldK71PIBZvzFfgEdimLRQJZrCN0+bTO7KY3gmP+9LoXEFF9hD8U=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3b0b:: with SMTP id i11-v6mr3896741oia.271.1526587378811; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a9d:23:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLzR0sj2-9KNH-Ripq6kHXVr7xR-EjEFkvnObjEoVDULQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A299772BE5B81D3F99BCCCE9@10.0.0.22> <CA+9kkMBJZC4zJW0i=wzHECgPot=wjxQeVHi1NDfhCsTvicgeOA@mail.gmail.com> <E9D4D65580FE1097406E9B9F@PSB> <20275.1526513131@dooku.sandelman.ca> <CAHw9_iLzR0sj2-9KNH-Ripq6kHXVr7xR-EjEFkvnObjEoVDULQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 16:02:58 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y_-3O-x71nWIuxA5WM-bY4IkjSk
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwjnQq9QOhBW2xffVOkvtewNzVu_NukY3rwpQC6tpza6wA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ecac1056c6c5270"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1qHV0bc3_fHI9iQBYMJKnq2qRFY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 20:03:02 -0000

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 1:26 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>
> > "Boss, J,K,Q and I will be working 30 hours overtime (each) that weekend
> getting
> > the interoperability bugs out of the code before we go to the IETF
> meeting
> > about the specification that determines what code we are supposed to
> write".
>
> > It actually won't get to "looking for another job", because the person
> likely
> > left when the IETF support went away.
>
>
> Yup, I see the hackathon as something which makes it easier, not harder to
> get support for.
> I see more of the "we would like to go to the hackathon to work with others
> on making sure our thingie works with their thingie. I'd like to stay a few
> days extra to attend the IETF as well" -- for some set of people, the
> chance for vendor G and vendor H to cooperate is more valuable than the
> (perceived) navel-gazing and comma fighting.
>

​+1

Also, I am in the position of looking to persuade my engineers to attend.​
They are much more interested in attending a hackathon than the WG session.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email