IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 24 October 2012 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEE121F86CB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFgQ5fuIYqzk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202EC21F86BC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ro8so1350685pbb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JyymWqffVqpR9t14RQ3trFaOZqB3buK3UWmwUbZOi2k=; b=DZQi4KqJB8xmftbd/x7a3O9QNv0HApkaiNSITRXP6ebw8qO9rpJoL4yC7/WHJkoQ3I CER+egc7bYF2C5emYzsZXJlzyFwnJmcaiunrpSS6TIkDetr39JHBh6d+2jO0f+VFL+UF ACNOJlv/f/DmHeL2ZudH+OfOR9WxPLRy3/ipB8+2z6tLRbcrKF3zBtbHRhqFVzJCeBNe YBaUvmeoVxckGd1WMKhnxMkZZSjWURsYMpeGgGCEN+98i6YTBUyS2wIyClfpPWdnhgAf 7hiNuj5FHEOHKhDoj8diMWVFmll1w7qBWJWjyV+FIxcL+jKMMjIKxoW1MEprMyRLputU XtqQ==
Received: by 10.68.129.72 with SMTP id nu8mr51457554pbb.29.1351097967713; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-49-109-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.49.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm9753944pav.26.2012.10.24.09.59.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50881E6C.7090105@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:59:24 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)
References: <50604C1A.7090901@gmx.de> <5060A964.5060001@stpeter.im> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210172354500.2478@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <507F5A7E.6040206@arcanedomain.com> <50856E3C.103@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210221753010.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <0DBC8A11-319C-4120-975E-7E40FD5818BF@gbiv.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210222137530.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <CA+9kkMDpEZCvcG1DJd=O1qPNV+=+GTBeN+CGndUe51Xym_A9sg@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210232115210.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <15E1D98B-8883-4936-81A9-174E1323683C@nordsc.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210232234590.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <8CC5FA04-2F61-408F-AED5-792E086E9BA0@nordsc.com>
In-Reply-To: <8CC5FA04-2F61-408F-AED5-792E086E9BA0@nordsc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:59:28 -0000

On 10/23/12 2:52 PM, Jan Algermissen wrote:
> Then, how about going from 'fixing STD 66' to
> 
> 'augmenting STD 66 with how we get from the provided string -the
> input to the reference construction process- to a valid URI'?

[ ... ]

> What matters is that nothing of the existing URI spec *changes*.

W00t!  Uh, that is to say, +1.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email