IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 24 October 2012 10:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B4A21F8BB4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id loZqomFhcaim for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FB321F8BB2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF9B2CF37; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:36:35 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P3ZFUVKZnhOB; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:36:35 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4102CC2F; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:36:35 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <5087C4B2.1060109@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:36:34 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Subject: Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)
References: <50604C1A.7090901@gmx.de> <5060A964.5060001@stpeter.im> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210172354500.2478@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <507F5A7E.6040206@arcanedomain.com> <50856E3C.103@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210221753010.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <0DBC8A11-319C-4120-975E-7E40FD5818BF@gbiv.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210222137530.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <CA+9kkMDpEZCvcG1DJd=O1qPNV+=+GTBeN+CGndUe51Xym_A9sg@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210232115210.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <CA+9kkMBg=hxz=yRYfYA5Hkwp-4ODFBnpK_qctCMB_oEHLPP49g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBg=hxz=yRYfYA5Hkwp-4ODFBnpK_qctCMB_oEHLPP49g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:36:38 -0000

Ted, Ian,

> Un-marked context shifts are
> likely, and likely to be bad.  Avoiding them by picking a new term is
> both easy and appropriate.

FWIW, I agree with Ted's advice above.

>
> My personal opinion, as always,
>

Mine too.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email