IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 24 September 2012 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BFC1F041D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9GRJ+0duiWNg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194351F0C5C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8OLW1pw020606; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1348522327; bh=reCyOmEzD5XbjLyar7HgaPsIBqhRfbN39NcULbFQyJQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Mp5f9HmQt0GGtQfkSbVOU1N94t/wJNjyZRzfiwULP573XXmiWReuIv3nIXmQdU7da MhN8BM8qxTAm9+cNIqUlkL2b0ZJNREyyT8zVKvKAgeV4+FkW8Yx3dAXuznTUOCRMgh x/Uq8Hz5OPIkfvgogue7pY359jjDqQmbymnGEsJM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1348522327; i=@resistor.net; bh=reCyOmEzD5XbjLyar7HgaPsIBqhRfbN39NcULbFQyJQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=ND4YoduN0DPRM144XI6fu3uqIbHRkCzJOkcXku1BAY/7r2AZQMa3gRYLavEpjp0iJ 8aHnX1ZZ0RMxCCbnNi13d5wlqnPwYVxs0Zjis+pKa5rMzpU1om9ZTGO0tr/u0duthj pVQhD+QmcbD5FZaZfzncrJRXSahipzLOLIlOiOHM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120924142604.0a5c6af8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:31:27 -0700
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)
In-Reply-To: <5060A964.5060001@stpeter.im>
References: <50604C1A.7090901@gmx.de> <5060A964.5060001@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:32:17 -0000

At 11:41 24-09-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>It's not completely clear to me what Anne meant there by saying "the
>plan is to obsolete the RFCs" (naturally that is not something that
>anyone outside the IETF can do, although they can ignore the RFCs).
>It's also not clear to me what the WHATWG HTML Living Standard [1]
>really means by "willful violation" [2] -- e.g., is it just an

The following message was posted over a year ago: 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg03064.html

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email