IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)

Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com> Tue, 23 October 2012 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6441F0C92 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.447, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQ70OIeaadLs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCA911E8099 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.103] (p548FAD1A.dip.t-dialin.net [84.143.173.26]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M1hZS-1TB30t32mw-00t0Bd; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:51:13 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard from Anne van Kesteren on 2012-09-24 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from September 2012)
From: Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210232115210.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:51:12 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <15E1D98B-8883-4936-81A9-174E1323683C@nordsc.com>
References: <50604C1A.7090901@gmx.de> <5060A964.5060001@stpeter.im> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210172354500.2478@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <507F5A7E.6040206@arcanedomain.com> <50856E3C.103@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210221753010.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <0DBC8A11-319C-4120-975E-7E40FD5818BF@gbiv.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210222137530.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <CA+9kkMDpEZCvcG1DJd=O1qPNV+=+GTBeN+CGndUe51Xym_A9sg@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1210232115210.2471@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:NdNMEzg6mgjjTyfrdaUe5ShWHZrmf4OS6+JQ62xs2hI jomLOrRMmX4eO8fSm2YfWDgQUtjlOxwa7K5ity4maUS+Vc4tC0 a6ZVZ21GlmwJVn2OxrH9iC5hGbV5TnsJJaLkxgEDpz/ucvuVpM gUjxkpjR5EWsvLonfpLLoGa8xiq6gVYAJRzfj/DdcdgX7o/bo8 SDUXF2cKxi0lbQ2w0DP6zB2s/+tGSJBxYAdMZKbeR8HFPTA47f HsM3pKueouH2vonRW/PAaub9ly1Xhv2bRbNslz5jvaCgNF7R1s w7slGc8AHPDCTR4Rt9JKBgW3MWM3geaOvOwvJe7YUcWXdjcbOy LV9PKoh4yrXz+DyGAoMqNFaZWu0DDKGYsipGW+FHCefIAUPRTs HjStGpLc//jBw==
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:37:10 -0700
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, URI <uri@w3.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:51:20 -0000

On Oct 23, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

>  Let's in fact try: Hi guys, we need to fix STD 66 
> because it doesn't define error handling. 

Help me, I am just not getting it:

Why do you insist on 'fixing STD 66'?

What is the reason you are not willing to reframe the problem to 'fixing how we get from the provided string -the input to the reference construction process- to a STD-66-valid result'?

To me this is really what you are aiming at and dropping the 'fix the URI spec' language would get everyone on board immediately in my perception.


Jan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email