Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Mon, 21 July 2008 17:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7AB3A6ADD; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D967B28C0F2; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.237
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.237 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.238, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kdNTTB+PtclJ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C974D3A6ADC; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-68-122-70-168.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.70.168]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6LHITRc029224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:18:29 -0700
Message-ID: <4884C4E4.2000705@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:18:28 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
References: <20080717213322.6B3F63A68B0@core3.amsl.com> <4880653B.5040000@cisco.com> <20080718142037.A8C2434DCB2@kilo.rtfm.com> <B11F38A0EB64D3F111ABEDDE@caldav.corp.apple.com> <F41EE021-1940-4260-AE6E-5E20E0CAA037@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F41EE021-1940-4260-AE6E-5E20E0CAA037@cisco.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/7766/Mon Jul 21 07:08:59 2008 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: iesg@iesg.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Fred Baker wrote: > Let me throw in v6ops as an example. We are very efficient, I think - > w have 10-15 minute discussions on each of a number of drafts in our > time. I would often like to allow a discussion to be longer, for the > same reason that we meet f2f in the first place - > > > No, cramming things in tighter isn't the solution. Fred, This seems to be a classic example of taking a specific counter-example and asserting that it generalizes for the whole. I believe it is the single-most damaging problem with how we publicly discuss change. Anyone promoting a point of view is going to find an example to support it. What we need, instead, is a sense of "typical", to use as the base for our consideration. Yes, we also need to consider outliers, but we need to treat them as such. We have working groups that are very well run. If, indeed, v6ops is an example -- I have no knowledge and therefore no opinion -- and if that type of working group is typical, then your conclusions probably should apply to this topic. But I believe it isn't typical -- indeed, I believe what you describe is a long way from typical -- and therefore it shouldn't be used as a pivotal basis for formulating strategic aspects of change. At the least, when anyone puts forward a particular example, they need to explain why anyone should believe that that example applies more generally, both in terms of the group and in terms of individual participants. (Some don't mind hitting the weekend, others do.) If we believe that most IETF working groups are doing productive work and most IETF meeting time is well-used, but it isn't sufficient, then yes we need more meeting time. If either of these two predicates do not apply, then we do not need more meeting time. We need changes in how we assign and use the time already available. > The thing that surprises me in this discussion is, frankly, the > representation of it as an "experiment". +1 > The question is whether the meetings are effective, and whether the > Secretariat finds it easier to meet the various demands placed on it. > I don't see how "more resources" can avoid making the Secretariat's > job easier. The question is how we use them. While agreeing with your last sentence, I think the rest of your paragraph contains the trap of assuming that more/bigger is always better. I bet you don't really mean that. For example, it does not make the Secretariat's job easier for them to have to work more hours... d/ ps. Even if we decide that the average group is not well run and doesn't need more time, there will of course be productive, well-run groups that do, indeed, need more time. They should get it. Oh, wait a minute, they already do. They need even more? OK, give it to them. Even at the expense of other wgs... -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday … IETF Chair
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Robert Sparks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Tony Hansen
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… James M. Polk
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Dave Crocker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Tony Hansen
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Bill Manning
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eliot Lear
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… michael.dillon
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eric Rosen
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Keith Moore
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Dave Crocker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Jari Arkko
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Cyrus Daboo
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Mary Barnes
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Cyrus Daboo
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Andy Bierman
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Dave Crocker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Dave Crocker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Spencer Dawkins
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Mary Barnes
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Dave Crocker
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Mary Barnes
- Conference calls (Was: Re: Proposed Experiment: M… Jari Arkko
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Mary Barnes
- Re: Conference calls (Was: Re: Proposed Experimen… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Keith Moore
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… James Galvin
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Dave Cridland
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Tom.Petch
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Ned Freed
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Fred Baker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Fred Baker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Dave Crocker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Dave Crocker
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… michael.dillon
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… michael.dillon
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… David Harrington
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Fred Baker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Fred Baker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eric Burger
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marc Manthey
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marc Manthey
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eric Burger
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Eric Burger
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Marc Manthey
- Teleconf [Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting T… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Teleconf [Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeti… Marc Manthey
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Fred Baker
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Daniel Brown
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Jari Arkko
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Russ Housley
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Fri… Glen Zorn