Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73

Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> Fri, 18 July 2008 03:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7999E3A6847; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7873A6847 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.509, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CF31kxoCAgtm for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB363A67B7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6I3DR3R022238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m6I3DQfv022234; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:13:26 -0700
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
Message-ID: <20080718031326.GA18225@boreas.isi.edu>
References: <20080717213322.6B3F63A68B0@core3.amsl.com> <487FC468.9010300@gmail.com> <487FC58E.7030209@att.com> <A72C8DD14448081A88E6C67A@p3.JCK.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A72C8DD14448081A88E6C67A@p3.JCK.COM>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@boreas.isi.edu
Cc: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

what is interesting to me is the weekend factor.
for nearly a decade, I've been going to mtgs the
wkend before the start of IETF - workshops, training sessions,
sidebars, RSSAC mtgs, etc.

about five years ago, the -other- suite of interesting/useful
meetings  started occuring the weekend -after- the
IETF was finished - more workshops, training sessions,
interop testing, OARC meetings, IRTF etc.

IETF working group meetings, per se, during the week
became less interesting, since actual work occured
the weekend before and the weekend after.

YMMV of course.


-- 
--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf