IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages

ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com Tue, 19 July 2011 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB48B21F8A70 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LS87M3VB1bpz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF4321F8A71 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O3TP8GHFZ400QSW4@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O3R1W8PRSW00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01O3TP8DZQF000RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:16:17 -0700
Subject: Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:41:35 +0200" <4E2429FF.9080202@alvestrand.no>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; Format="flowed"
References: <CAC4RtVBGgk74VMEty9u5Yq+DFy=oR5tOnbZ3R5x83Gyee6mRNw@mail.gmail.com> <29987.1310565058@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4E1DCA13.9030301@acm.org> <04AE56F0C4CE8168D1B38D59@PST.JCK.COM> <p0624066dca44df0ca50f@loud.pensive.org> <49A68144182BB270C11BC841@PST.JCK.COM> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134EBC4D4B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <FDD50EB2-B783-49B3-92C2-56A21EFAEF11@guppylake.com> <4E2429FF.9080202@alvestrand.no>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1311088738; i=@mrochek.com; bh=do5WjkYBTeWlTW5FbCxVyA8/xQJRdD1TT7G0kj+i0HY=; h=From:Cc:Message-id:Date:Subject:In-reply-to:MIME-version: Content-type:References:To; b=ArD/OXlFQQO6QbOr5vZvhtIz0uWhZwoNOhAUI0z9hoSUyViVhfSnM9QIADEVF4Ab3 sl98WWCCYayyOb+YpRBM4RYOWQjO/m0NZuuaWHWQa7q5BQvEyJwCTgYQFl1TvGqAp9 uD6y6AnGhGzrodrtdLSWtQcBen7obqM9hAW09DVA=
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:20:03 -0000

> Content-disposition: noise.

Harald, I was about to say the same thing but you beat me to it. Unless we're
prepared to talk about defining a general format for such notices (and I'm
pretty sure we're not interested in doing that), this doesn't fit as a media
type - I can easily envision using various different types depending on the
sort of notice I want to send.

But a content-disposition value has the right semantics and makes all sorts
of sense.

				Ned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email