IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com> Tue, 17 June 2008 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFEC3A6B2E; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADA33A68E0; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r0meAanZK0Y9; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43713A6B2E; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=ldondeti@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1213722496; x=1245258496; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-ironport-av; z=Message-ID:=20<4857EF7E.6060407@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Tu e,=2017=20Jun=202008=2010:08:14=20-0700|From:=20Lakshmina th=20Dondeti=20<ldondeti@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Thun derbird=202.0.0.14=20(Windows/20080421)|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20dcrocker@bbiw.net|CC:=20iesg@ietf.org,=20ietf@ie tf.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Appeal=20against=20IESG=20blockin g=20DISCUSS=20on=09draft-klensin-rfc2821bis|References: =20<6B100D42B8C49F65FCBBED8E@klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch .net>=09<48535EAD.6000704@qualcomm.com>=20<20080617130256 .GM32214@nsn.com>=20<4857E594.6010406@qualcomm.com>=20<48 57EA1F.3020108@dcrocker.net>|In-Reply-To:=20<4857EA1F.302 0108@dcrocker.net>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charse t=3DISO-8859-15=3B=20format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DM cAfee=3Bi=3D"5200,2160,5318"=3B=20a=3D"3987598"; bh=Nm9X7FWHKiHWUvhHJ6G0cJ/ipeP0gwEyVoghNI+WU6A=; b=S9tSm2N1GkPRSau0blDXkSeNGMwAqX+o51u0ljK7j2qGfGm+azbbc4Wy MN6MLOMhgRmo2uTnOgBcHF4aIUlJLmMhr+bJQYs7OWt1i1eb2vp10snsg HneHs7sjgliRJZq6yWl6xUjAVrKImhlMjhHovQuyfRJR/6G1umZUg097N s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5318"; a="3987598"
Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO numenor.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 17 Jun 2008 10:08:16 -0700
Received: from msgtransport02.qualcomm.com (msgtransport02.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.151]) by numenor.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id m5HH8Gwd005991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:08:16 -0700
Received: from [129.46.75.144] (ldondeti.na.qualcomm.com [129.46.75.144]) by msgtransport02.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id m5HH8Fj5024645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:08:16 -0700
Message-ID: <4857EF7E.6060407@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:08:14 -0700
From: Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
References: <6B100D42B8C49F65FCBBED8E@klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch.net> <48535EAD.6000704@qualcomm.com> <20080617130256.GM32214@nsn.com> <4857E594.6010406@qualcomm.com> <4857EA1F.3020108@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4857EA1F.3020108@dcrocker.net>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


On 6/17/2008 9:45 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> 
> Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thank you for sharing this information.  Now that the community knows 
>> this, perhaps this will be an option when there are snags in the 
>> process in future.
> 
> 
> Folks keep missing the point:  The current situation is not about 
> lacking creativity or options.  It is about having rules but failing to 
> follow them or inventing them on the fly.

I am not claiming that not having precedence (which is now corrected to 
widely-known precedence) is the only problem.  However, there is a point 
here in that if one or two ADs are "failing to follow [rules] or 
inventing them on the fly," what are the rest of the IESG members doing?

I have received a few responses, offline and in this thread to that 
question.

regards,
Lakshminath

> 
> What David's note underscores is that it is entirely possible to take 
> even a difficult Discuss and attempt to pursue it actively and 
> constructively.
> 
> His seeking to assess consensus within the IESG is an exemplary case of 
> trying to work as a team rather than an 'expert' individual.
> 
> d/
> 
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email