Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> Wed, 18 June 2008 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597BA28C1BF; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9883028C1AF; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -92.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-92.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-10.893, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, URIBL_BLACK=20, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, WHOIS_NETSOLPR=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7gj9o2SlBJi0; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multicasttech.com (unknown [63.105.122.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802523A6AD7; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [63.105.122.7] (account marshall_eubanks HELO [IPv6:::1]) by multicasttech.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 11798197; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:59:50 -0400
Message-Id: <3726330F-F3C0-4164-B317-AE35F2F253AB@multicasttech.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: <48581239.6090408@dcrocker.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Subject: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:59:49 -0400
References: <8832006D4D21836CBE6DB469@klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch.net><485590E2.3080107@gmail.com><p06250116c47c330c7dd0@[75.145.176.242]> <4856DE3A.3090804@gmail.com> <049b01c8d089$6c901ce0$0a00a8c0@CPQ86763045110> <2CCD27FF-11C6-4460-844F-AF12285EA2E5@multicasttech.com> <48581239.6090408@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Dear Dave;

On Jun 17, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

>
>
> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> I fully agree with Debbie here.
>> Human experience teaches us that examples will
>> be used, over time.
>
> Seems like 25+ years is a pretty solid sample size of experience, to  
> test such a theory.*
>
> So you won't have any trouble providing data to support your  
> conclusion that, indeed, there is a problem?
>

I don't know - I do not own generic.com, foo.com, foo.org, bar.org or  
bar.com. Has anyone asked these companies (at least foo.com and  
bar.com are actual companies) or the domain holders for their opinion  
and experience in this matter ? For that matter, has anyone asked  
Jorge Contreras for his opinion as our counsel on the legal liability  
we might be incurring by using their names ?

I do know that if I did own one of those companies, I would request  
that this document be changed.

Regards
Marshall

> [Once again:  Not that that is the core issue being appealed.]
>
> d/
>
> * In theory, there isn't much difference between theory and  
> practice.  In practice...
>
>
> -- 
>
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf