IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 08 July 2020 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30653A0C13; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R2bdiAyc2x_5; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 06:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6A8E3A0C2B; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 06:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p200300dee7007a003d8b8bffd80b599d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:de:e700:7a00:3d8b:8bff:d80b:599d]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jtAUy-0003qK-8M; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 15:52:32 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200708035438.11253038@elandnews.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 15:52:31 +0200
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, iab@iab.org, iesg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6B45878D-0577-47E5-9D3E-ECE22D7A5D1B@kuehlewind.net>
References: <159318840162.4951.12569119165623562334@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200627023025.0b145350@elandnews.com> <07A3985F-1FB0-4F88-8651-249F443144EA@kuehlewind.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20200708035438.11253038@elandnews.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1594216366;e0300e60;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1jtAUy-0003qK-8M
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Gk3Bi16p_4IPTlsl6HDuaslUknY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 13:52:56 -0000

Hi,

The point where the IAB is more directly involved in reviewing of new work is the BoF coordination call as well as acting as BoF shepherds and by providing BoF reports. I believe most members of the IAB are actively monitoring new chartering work. At least I can definitely confirm that I and our IESG liaison are aware of all charter discussions. 

Mirja


> On 8. Jul 2020, at 13:27, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> At 03:23 AM 08-07-2020, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>> On this point:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> IAB members can review proposed charters during community review process but there is no formal step for the IAB to review all proposed charters. I'm not sure why you may think this is especially needed in this case given meeting planning lies in responsibility of the IESG (or LCC with respect to financial and contractual aspects)
> ?
> 
> The theory is that IAB advises the IESG on the chartering of new working groups.  I don't know how it works in practice as I did enquired about it until a week or so ago.  The point of the question was to ascertain that the IAB is aware of the proposed charter.
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email