Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 14 July 2020 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092093A00C4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 06:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=bKb3Md72; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=DS9h55le
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zz-YBPeG_wbf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 06:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B1963A003D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 06:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC35A5C0127; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:22:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:22:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=k BB6OUnRCiN28yExhXzF7562b8dklTZAUhajMnxjY5s=; b=bKb3Md72M8f+mMOFh IwMik53Oy2Zuf11kuhctVQ1MExwqUS50OeC6qpahrPAZEHh6sj92An9epMaa0jex 6O8vsTsn6MzUma0CtYwn5qUuvp2k5c/aa8bSvWnVRbTa7H8pFZtdHbkNqHvVOUes zBnbnGc6cOaJd4uRMknpbIAjip8I1wKHi+2icjuqCLc4B+9VFj59F3i7sBW7lhg0 XgubszyLsc1gCEQqOhcAf2CXiSQtknsvGFM0nJvbMT6xlXikGYZbOoVC1c4X54L2 E7Ei4woyEizphYb5c3Q9u7/PquCorqY2IBJWL4txIieelM7K9Gb+6msXIU2+gs/v Jq5YQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=kBB6OUnRCiN28yExhXzF7562b8dklTZAUhajMnxjY 5s=; b=DS9h55leI0dZ6my3Cavc+kwtguHsRjXaflrAhwzM3eb8Czep/8yD8LGdD OiuMXsF0KiqkSdtULLudfRLvei69pveTFEyqIBkusOnNJtMm8jtqO/HLf5fTPU9J /mAiChnr/AFGfz1yu3KYyew1VNoJAiSXuuZZ/fGnob1t8rjOwvtJpTO+pXWacDS4 3Xq1BlzC2vYCBpwvgZCTJKjqHSkHSgI5PM2DyPjaZvafHavhnH5VrYn55QhkO1sZ bnFRipkJO9woP/mYXN1zEyq1Zj64TzrdItU5ute3qfn+PMhHuq78eTzkZY7cR1+k K0N8rm+PgB89OYd2ioc//S2L06LBw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ibENX9vN2mk0oNV0Rck2cpx_RqwKQbc5d0Jf0hwhqRGrR2M8njHTUQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrfedtgdeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmh dthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestgho ohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefguedtkeethfekleehheethedvke ektedtvddvjefghfeikeffgeegveefueegtdenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhg necukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrkeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ibENX2eE9p7NWKR_eaaUD_YIxjocGJ_KAfq9FgcslQepJ0_Qs2TGDQ> <xmx:ibENXwxCP4JzXws-GAptQ36i65Kug1SS5S4Py0zvx0nTeekNINmCCg> <xmx:ibENX0NTOdpbWTSJSPYd4ekT380c48-kuAkxMx6Q6etY5GITnoTe7A> <xmx:ibENXwL5Bt3AfNqYKYXqBBPuZkLJW2UmVnYgjtKzxNxHxRI9-UM2jA>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.83]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0CC0930600A6; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:22:17 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
Subject: Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200713124426.0b87c770@elandnews.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:22:15 -0400
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7F116050-D36E-4B78-80CD-48DEC24E32F1@cooperw.in>
References: <159318840162.4951.12569119165623562334@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200627023025.0b145350@elandnews.com> <5C58F041-9991-49DA-98B6-6700499DFBC9@cooperw.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20200709132444.098ec410@elandnews.com> <CALaySJJbNHu=ktzeUX+k5Rj2bt2UQkx262mvD7wHLzEVXw3VxQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200710102806.0b084a90@elandnews.com> <CALaySJJwTLKgcEyWwmhPin3sX1C9kAMdj+ukMi2wfdAh399m7Q@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200710113940.0ac68208@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200712111856.0a815438@elandnews.com> <C30D52D7-376C-4599-93E8-48D16BDB262A@cooperw.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20200713124426.0b87c770@elandnews.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oxpR-SsN-Jcm_DfCSUQROfkodcU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:22:20 -0000

Hi SM,

> On Jul 13, 2020, at 6:08 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alissa,
> 
> I have a few questions:
> 
>  1. Who proposed the draft charter?

Suresh Krishnan, Russ Housley, and myself. See <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/Qls9UHKkG4kE9KKK4WQ-KBc0oLg/>.

> 
>  2. Who approved the draft charter?

The IESG.

> 
>  3. Why was the draft charter approved while there was an ongoing
>     discussion with the IESG about it?

There didn’t seem to be any outstanding requests for changes to the charter text that would prevent its approval.

> 
>  4. Are the milestones listed at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/UB3zrC22s1B89PEwAOM-Y488TRs/
>     compliant with RFC 2418?

Yes.

Alissa

> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>