Re: How to pay $47 for a copy of RFC 793

"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Tue, 10 May 2011 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56DAE0749 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.37
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.829, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XkkBnEE-xpDu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AF6E0662 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 66415 invoked from network); 10 May 2011 23:44:06 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 10 May 2011 23:44:06 -0000
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:43:44 -0000
Message-ID: <20110510234344.77140.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: How to pay $47 for a copy of RFC 793
In-Reply-To: <4DC9BE0D.4070308@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:44:10 -0000

>>> It is a lot more time (and money) saving to search free
>>> versions before entering transactions to purchase them than
>>> to rely blindly on PubMed, IEEE, ACM, google scholar etc.
>
>So?

I expect that most people who use those databases have site
licenses, so they don't care whether the articles are nominally
free or not.

When I need to do database searches, I go to the Cornell engineering
library where I can get (quite legally) onto Cornell's network and use
their institutional subscriptions.  If I find something interesting, I
click on it and download it, and have no idea whether it would have
asked a non-subscriber to pay or not.

I'm more worried that the ACM doesn't have any RFCs issued in the past
seven years than that they ask non-subscribers to pay for the ones
they do have.

R's,
John