Re: How to pay $47 for a copy of RFC 793

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 12 May 2011 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B949CE0671 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v+ovAJdUjhBy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474B8E06A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5.Beta0) with ESMTP id p4C5gF0u025238; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1305178943; bh=cbgA8o29mXnFTsutf5jM/EiJmDHIJAjDriww/5YnEik=; h=Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=cZvPyONBotDZZ7aOkvS+/fmi2ZrfKz2JQWKKeKiMWXSmHxoKWWHXYy5FDomPpjDsh dcfDFdwMfQ22ychx+XOfdr3ydVmhf02knWl/L1FJVvr4xDQhs65PE9MWDoEp+LCJ70 3OMEiHHYp5JQafWaP+WhpKHiw/jwPqRfYthYBSFY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1305178943; bh=cbgA8o29mXnFTsutf5jM/EiJmDHIJAjDriww/5YnEik=; h=Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Vd+NhQCwILxWADorN7hSV3zIlYAsihmSTu+8EtV16EQkxPa1XjRNpMxbcZOG1nCs1 IUwhmQgEKoQFQeKMShQT90d0QaYBKca7sU0hKnBQpItFoow3chD8HtxTtZjsnhFQo7 4VjFucmij7c/cVhHo8irOmztcl1XFx/vBAOspn7Q=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110511221025.04c42140@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:17:55 -0700
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: How to pay $47 for a copy of RFC 793
In-Reply-To: <4DCB242C.4090109@isi.edu>
References: <20110509234100.5411.qmail@joyce.lan> <4BEFE8F6-D58C-4495-98CC-6A832976F0D5@shinkuro.com> <4DCB242C.4090109@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 05:42:27 -0000

Hi Joe,
At 17:05 11-05-2011, Joe Touch wrote:
>Paradoxically, I-Ds do already include a similar statement:
>
>    The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
>    http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
>
>    The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
>    http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
>
>Pity we don't include that sort of thing in the RFCs too...

 From the "Status of This Memo" section of RFC 5741:

   "Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
    and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
    http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5741."

Regards,
-sm