IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

"mark.paton" <mark.paton@btinternet.com> Wed, 19 July 2000 07:10 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id DAA07988 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 03:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carbon.btinternet.com (carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA01862 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 02:56:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [213.1.145.106] (helo=patonmj) by carbon.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 13Enlx-0007Pq-00; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 07:56:01 +0100
From: "mark.paton" <mark.paton@btinternet.com>
To: Eli Sanchez <geekfreak2000@yahoo.com>, Greg Skinner <gds@BEST.COM>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 07:59:51 +0100
Message-ID: <NCBBINIKLKLJEEDCGLOAEEGFCHAA.mark.paton@btinternet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0028_01BFF157.51A156C0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4029.2901
In-reply-to: <20000718150202.4234.qmail@web4601.mail.yahoo.com>
Importance: Normal
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

I think we are moving off subject here, why not
drop the thread and concentrate on the job in
hand!!

Regards

Mark Paton CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng
Mercury Network Systems Limited
+44 585 649051
+44 1256 761925
http://www.mnsl.org

"Mercury Network Systems - The Unstoppable Force"

This e-mail is intended only for the addressee
named above. As this e-mail may contain
confidential or privileged information if you are
not, or suspect that you are not, the named
addressee or the person responsible for delivering
the message to the named addressee, please
telephone us immediately. Please note that we
cannot guarantee that this message or any
attachment is virus free or has not been
intercepted and amended.


The views of the author may not necessarily
reflect those of the Company.


-----Original Message-----
From: Eli Sanchez [mailto:geekfreak2000@yahoo.com]
Sent: 18 July 2000 16:02
To: Greg Skinner; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re:
draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt


Wrong I'm reading it :P  Leave AOL alone.
 There are
many FREE connections to select one can
have AOL and
many other "raw" connections.  Maybe we
like AOL, and
that is why we pick it.  AOlers also know that AOL
isnt top class but we like easy listening
once in a
while :P We're not all idiots and
although there are
some exceptions we have brains to!

-Eli

--- Greg Skinner <gds@best.com> wrote:
> Masataka Ohta wrote:
>
> > If IETF makes it clear that AOL is
not an ISP, it
> will commercially
> > motivate AOL to be an ISP.
>
> Why?  Certainly, they are aware that
they are not an
> ISP by your
> definition.  It hasn't changed their business
> practices.  Why would
> an IETF RFC change their business
practices?  The
> business practices
> of AOL are determined, for the most
part, by what
> Wall Street and
> their customers think is important, not what the
> IETF thinks.  Most
> of their customers are unlikely to read
such an RFC
> anyway.
>
> --gregbo
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can
access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email