Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

[Eli Sanchez <[e-mail]>]

Wrong I'm reading it :P  Leave AOL alone.  There are
many FREE connections to select one can have AOL and
many other "raw" connections.  Maybe we like AOL, and
that is why we pick it.  AOlers also know that AOL
isnt top class but we like easy listening once in a
while :P We're not all idiots and although there are
some exceptions we have brains to!

-Eli

--- Greg Skinner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Masataka Ohta wrote:
> 
> > If IETF makes it clear that AOL is not an ISP, it
> will commercially
> > motivate AOL to be an ISP.
> 
> Why?  Certainly, they are aware that they are not an
> ISP by your
> definition.  It hasn't changed their business
> practices.  Why would
> an IETF RFC change their business practices?  The
> business practices
> of AOL are determined, for the most part, by what
> Wall Street and
> their customers think is important, not what the
> IETF thinks.  Most
> of their customers are unlikely to read such an RFC
> anyway.
> 
> --gregbo
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/