Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> Tue, 11 July 2000 02:30 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id WAA04665 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 22:30:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ogma.cisco.com (ogma.cisco.com [144.254.74.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA04500 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 22:13:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nordic.cisco.com (nordic.cisco.com [144.254.116.14]) by ogma.cisco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3AABA4; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 04:12:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from [10.0.0.3] ([171.70.221.22]) by nordic.cisco.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA17635; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 04:12:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: pfaltstr@nordic.cisco.com
Message-Id: <p04320402b590408e2bcd@[10.0.0.3]>
In-Reply-To: <200007110143.VAA20661@astro.cs.utk.edu>
References: <200007110143.VAA20661@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:13:19 -0700
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt
Cc: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@CS.UCL.AC.UK>, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

At 21.43 -0400 00-07-10, Keith Moore wrote:
>not bloody likely.  some things are inexcusable.  munging data in
>transit is one of them.  the fact that you may have a business
>model that says you can make money doing something that is inexcusable
>is not a justification for doing that thing.

I don't see any problems people making money on weird 
NAT-munging-weirdo-webonly-wap things which they sell to customers, 
BUT, it is NOT Internet access.

I would not buy it, because I want Internet access.

What I oppose strongly, is that people sell weird stuff and call it Internet.

   paf