Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

[Masataka Ohta <[e-mail]>]

Greg;

> I could make the argument that they provide Internet access, in the
> sense that one can use these providers to gain access to a subset of
> content and services that is "traditionally" called Internet service.
> I would support them being classified as Internet Access Providers
> (IAPs).  In some circles, that's what they're called.

Your points are taken that you can call them WASP (Web Access Service
Providers).


							Masakaka Ohta