Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> Tue, 17 June 2008 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEB13A6A55; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3D73A6A44 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1KnU51OYY20u for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yxa-v.extundo.com (yxa-v.extundo.com [83.241.177.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B443A6A55 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yxa.extundo.com ([83.241.177.38] helo=mocca.josefsson.org) by yxa-v.extundo.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <simon@josefsson.org>) id 1K8XVv-0005e1-Up; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:30:12 +0200
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
To: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
Subject: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
References: <8832006D4D21836CBE6DB469@klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch.net> <485590E2.3080107@gmail.com> <p06250116c47c330c7dd0@[75.145.176.242]> <4856DE3A.3090804@gmail.com> <g36r20$bgq$1@ger.gmane.org> <48575B7E.9030003@ca.afilias.info>
OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:22:080617:briand@ca.afilias.info::GZICGlH9bMZnWIZf:3IIP
X-Hashcash: 1:22:080617:hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com::d7tiAjmH3TnYYRs7:7nZc
X-Hashcash: 1:22:080617:ietf@ietf.org::uCMiM9XuMGUxTIxV:CLIz
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:30:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <48575B7E.9030003@ca.afilias.info> (Brian Dickson's message of "Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:36:46 -0400")
Message-ID: <87hcbse7du.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>; writes:

> Here's my suggestion:
>
> List 2606 in the informative references, and footnote the examples used 
> to indicate
> that they are "grandfathered" non-2606 examples.
>
> So, in text that previously read "not-example.com", it might read 
> "not-example.com [*]",
> with the references section having "[*] Note - non-RFC2606 examples 
> used. Please read RFC2606."
>
> Something along those lines, should hopefully be enough to keep both 
> sides happy, and resolve the DISCUSS,
> and hopefully both set a suitable precedent *and* make moot the appeal.

I think this sounds like a good compromise, and it does improve the
document quality IMHO.  John, would this be an acceptable addition to
the document?

Thanks,
Simon
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf