Re: [ietf-smtp] the inedible parts of IETF dogfood consumption - SMTP version

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 18 December 2019 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA95120073 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:07:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=AXP2yKEl; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=fLl9CfYW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ro00uGhCWcXf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C37120043 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 55184 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2019 02:07:27 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=d78e.5df989df.k1912; i=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=m1mpGGKXPpppI/1P/zJS2GdnOsHX89oNAdauHzPkugM=; b=AXP2yKEleYeQZAGOyG2cTyie0JyO2dC/9AAVWHcYH6Crzc2g0tRDG/OnFoHX1Ji932QnVlRI+Axmfw0LkC9yDwH/okBCCgMH6/ITTx5XC5ukdVNGwSuGZdPI70jSE4b4NYs5zbOv7LulukQRgWbV4lSzC9hOoi3G8GS8X8sGB/c05LmPbPQY5ZD3DUrjxLj7YCO3mDCGn1OCqANm8dFxpb9Lsd06xJUGTiGAJT2Ajjf8bqh7QoaqumNgOCqzMz0i
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=d78e.5df989df.k1912; olt=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=m1mpGGKXPpppI/1P/zJS2GdnOsHX89oNAdauHzPkugM=; b=fLl9CfYWtwRyoslwSgOlj63wI1YDyjOLPUmMJChKHBXoKVXzp+TpRFvfyi3m4Ij13oK/+L7lxCrNCG2SDQfvVQyhw9zQ1dn/SQ0VhEahGHjniaNDvnjrkB7M23pzwfbLG9Eq7ZWp8d5ABXXuiqt1TkcMkFWNGotNJGDfNkpg18LhhrioIhbd4Bk+3/YQSi5ykCKYPABVtem48YqYYx+GK+LSfpeCHE8B+3BZqUb71mzf/uj5oCn92YRZWK44mUKb
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, printer@iecc.com) via TCP6; 18 Dec 2019 02:07:26 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4FA601178860; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:07:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:07:25 -0500
Message-Id: <20191218020726.4FA601178860@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: moore@network-heretics.com
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] the inedible parts of IETF dogfood consumption - SMTP version
In-Reply-To: <de9253b3-d545-a477-168e-4c1b50ec0cba@network-heretics.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Xph11FYOflg_TDlf_hchxpHNzlk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 02:07:29 -0000

In article <de9253b3-d545-a477-168e-4c1b50ec0cba@network-heretics.com> you write:
>Spam filters are a good example.   Poorly chosen spam filters are the 
>primary reason that email has become so unreliable.

Actually, spam is the primary reason that email has become so
unreliable.  If you did't do spam filtering, however imperfectly, your
mailbox would be so awash in junk you couldn't find the trickle of
real mail.

On my tiny system that handles a dozen users I deal with upwards of
50,000 spam messages a day.  I gather that for large commercial
systems it's in the billions.

R's,
John