Re: [ietf-smtp] the inedible parts of IETF dogfood consumption - SMTP version

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 18 December 2019 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568A3120091 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:37:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3wsERWrcIkjw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5994120043 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22387221F7; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:37:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:37:26 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KddUCRIBWcmKwi1os1peLCCMLogZk3LyMRKkeTqUz vs=; b=q0wBV/wT4LQAMm6BgrXO4WWcGcaX1ITmB4oV64vm5S7LOoH4BV8XLuz4U sfXoiF4NeeuPriAHEnCt97VrT0kMEQM3reLahAi+R8PbxlkfeXsbEbFBRfCRApj+ Niis7F5QLQl8HNU208vsFvwqk+VLfD9QWV2qF3eRqe4t+N+hmkSVeGOaXt56TX87 /pSVvbIzSFhr9L7ICqW5Zeg4sGJzQyY0cTNau3gt3Pwxufic2m9rDqI42FDRwaW9 b2cXuZblsVVYqxHrX/6zXRRfHYy/d9RpCEU1IqjlYoLH5p5rBTR26duBgzewSgK9 gjctHH93ctomjUgHgz1V724BrlrrQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:5JD5XVggJPKhNd9odwUmmzIN9DO6Yw8zqnBR1rzW5u9dWkYmIB0pQw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvddtkedggeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihht hhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh eqnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrdduheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:5JD5XemgkseSYP_TbkTK9R06KgHnJ-lhztjf0JaD-s7k0DpoYdx9vw> <xmx:5JD5XahcfDprx88s7laWPPv_3qZDRIQAZ10-TD5YZQurVPnE4WU6Qg> <xmx:5JD5Xc7LACDamdCIbKotAuqYxlsxhYWMGNhbTtbISbFh2UcNN7QQVA> <xmx:5pD5XdiwAvvi1UK4Q5BP0d8gi4yVNHS9U1vMkXGANWo5UMy60R3lQA>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6E758005C; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:37:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] the inedible parts of IETF dogfood consumption - SMTP version
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20191218020726.4FA601178860@ary.qy>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <aacdb008-a894-d116-d0ee-afb5bfa36477@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:37:20 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191218020726.4FA601178860@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vhVdMwwaewbWEaj_um89x8jShFc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 02:37:29 -0000

On 12/17/19 9:07 PM, John Levine wrote:

> In article <de9253b3-d545-a477-168e-4c1b50ec0cba@network-heretics.com> you write:
>> Spam filters are a good example.   Poorly chosen spam filters are the
>> primary reason that email has become so unreliable.
> Actually, spam is the primary reason that email has become so
> unreliable.  If you did't do spam filtering, however imperfectly, your
> mailbox would be so awash in junk you couldn't find the trickle of
> real mail.

I did say "poorly chosen" spam filters.   I don't claim that all spam 
filters are poorly chosen, but I've seen many that are.

As it turns out, I have several mailboxes with no spam filtering, and 
they're not awash in junk.   But mileage does vary - I have other 
mailboxes that do have spam filtering and are still awash in junk.

Keith