Re: Specific Questions about Registration details for IETF 108

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 09 June 2020 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182493A08D3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oo6l_W53fNi2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A362F3A08C9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.118.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 059KoPkC005559 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1591735837; x=1591822237; i=@elandsys.com; bh=a1cXTNkicHGvXeGqXN9+NiPiVbFMWugO1G+U4k1LRoE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=LUfhzylhyxb6z1IDq4kGU3hRJtwx33b0du7iDInmViZUIncIBhpALj2xZOslmCLb7 YH1dj36gexJf/wZxftvPZ1yp/9qOGlMuQx7nIYgZCucZ8i68r+10Fv+xIbUSZuqNb0 NlfNcIQ1LQT6+HRT/dvMk6OMSKHkTLeSUPz4Qnb8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200609122824.0c7c6560@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:49:05 -0700
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Specific Questions about Registration details for IETF 108
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C1FEB0975CA759283715AB54@PSB>
References: <159062833754.6110.5826748635235943562@ietfa.amsl.com> <3B19A920-9D33-4E3D-8B8B-8134A5E55316@gmail.com> <86D7C39D-9778-4408-B7CA-CB74E9572B1B@ietf.org> <511A3EE0-976B-40FF-813A-58CC115E760A@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200609102611.0c7c5db0@elandnews.com> <C1FEB0975CA759283715AB54@PSB>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XthmF28T2hQaFIAZ8zrkGwITyHo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:51:01 -0000

Hi John,
At 12:15 PM 09-06-2020, John C Klensin wrote:
>Just for clarification, by "previous remote attendees", you mean
>people who have regularly been attending remotely for some time
>and not just, for example those who remotely attended IETF 107?
>Right?  Or, if not, can you explain?
> >...

Remote attendees would be people who usually attend remotely, people 
who attend one meeting remotely and people attending meeting when it 
is relevant to them.  I did not rely on the IETF 107 figures only.

> > I did not factor in a new restriction [1] as I only
> > noticed it a few minutes ago.
>
>See separate thread that I'm about to start.

Ok.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy