Re: On diversity in the NomCom

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 15 July 2020 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0073A0856 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o58GGG2hT5Fj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD983A084D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id ch3so3717590pjb.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=claypagi6WoMe/nl7lqsE9CagDa3NLGAg4k0Aq7I0D8=; b=lwqIDDSr+JDtLjmxujHohIj6vVaM3cNk6OvaHBlL2W+1F3I6N3B8m9d8CAnwAsVRqN pCx/88LxMZNhwk9hZA0TnFPoy8gfm8NXhCLXy+xAI8op/QYkign0UtsHJ2ZbGDThtrqR vnii7gyoLDfQpUzZJ4NN+q1nnYxj3+KvCv2mCEru9GA+lcRROsjqTK/oX7mjc7LcyUWv /bWu507bx9vHZKB4Kf+dK7QpQkQhGJRNwBwqTlLNR8Srh+9Rb6FAZ2EJgH0Qrp9qdBKk rABhW8DHnHNbpbCmYudmPmAXNUc00+IHZm6uXjEQkMNqed0+tFMtJyu50WnTQpecGvcQ OJzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=claypagi6WoMe/nl7lqsE9CagDa3NLGAg4k0Aq7I0D8=; b=dSxlu3v3WTdX2+tSZDaqVidIsoHiaP3RcvKV4IgXcj9GCVCoxF22oT1iXF+N0GPGTy 9LYlN22rh17z+QR+CmjbV3F48zKBb3QsImvDMrtEUV6HKQ8BLQl6oiQO0Qcns3g3w8iP q3LdYw9ic9XSsHpJv7IMLCBLZPMj/LUL5agJZNhO5ozikhCHLfVWjieG1R+AH+4ODgqa uEPQI2J1LPdQoK150Qz/gr3vvAemAUVdeMlSKyKXsEYgTIbWYXOFvVhxo7pMCwmgVtg8 dgdAp0iFBNlpoUkTe3qZJ5uzFpFZCYRlYAeuNdJPsS6TGDPvxwizlRNkQgvTJ0VU4x0D KgcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/6kokwPeSfhJcIsvlXa5CZR4/13ugjhZPuWzajEukMchros+E ydhimesAzjBwyVI1WKiOiS7BZNZB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9opq+kcDTnJJHztpuw11ooqoOMUSwmpngAZBUMLesTGlxI/pBzPHXD6z397LnehfL/Lk9UA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a60e:: with SMTP id u14mr1128081plq.238.1594847425188; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.132.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f72sm2856606pfa.66.2020.07.15.14.10.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: On diversity in the NomCom
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <7429392e-a411-4c40-8fa9-f03de558b7ca@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CAChr6Sweag6G2sfdOrpGUZnPybK4eqn-EHFVHMgSv5V+MtHcow@mail.gmail.com> <d3187a20-76a8-0ef9-d32f-6b8e400a0d30@gmail.com> <ee517835-1ad4-e2c0-a33b-e194f7c37f95@gmail.com> <CAChr6SxXwKwwtXxL+9f2Zz8kufpnOLmHHkK-dY6PC+k9mNE4+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <16772aec-9ead-3658-16c8-dfbcdfa19edc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 09:10:20 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SxXwKwwtXxL+9f2Zz8kufpnOLmHHkK-dY6PC+k9mNE4+w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YCaTom0fw5SPWpooymbqtyItrZo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:10:28 -0000

On 15-Jul-20 20:51, Rob Sayre wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 1:57 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Nevertheless, the fact is that big
>     companies can (and do) send more people, and provide more sponsorship
>     (such as hosting meetings, and funding Area Directors), than small
>     companies. If they didn't get something back for that, they would
>     complain, or simply withdraw their resources.
> 
> 
> This seems like one of those things that might not "return to normal".
> 
> IETF work seems to be proceeding fine without people flying long distances to sit in a hotel conference room and look at their laptops.

That doesn't change my argument that big companies are more able than small companies to donate resources to the IETF. Whether those resources come out of the travel budget is a detail.

   Brian