Re: On diversity in the NomCom

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Mon, 13 July 2020 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56E83A16E7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MpSIwPKKRUZ3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com (nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com [17.151.62.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41793A15D8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06DHOgdX058302; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:27:51 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=20180706; bh=JMgmKw+r7COemhTlLG4w+/0RBHbg7t8yDjdnFcCAlHk=; b=dHhOkRvWeg+GWRApqk+zktBPvGCnQQomuUE+H0oQr4DAotQJnAc5ejhuofQznkEAzz9V G3/ctGeAhNjwstXkYwfoyTIJ1QWc0MRU7XzcfG4azHovkLf0y2Y2yfKx5gKswXuVO9XW V2rS19/R9L+v6WuWR/QQ9vnwLZkoRKUhnvjEWrn/vTe2IeJ0tWpXdHCQUzvM1pjU8FXY sI68ekI1iB++qE5PxA3COYNzTuybHQYkmgnCFzFIOJIu5pUOcL2JBuMX7me2bz4F83ti DYo9CmWxCTMxccH24JwUbXesRb/ptduTQYivQzH3CA3iRbmrqGEBPTtRgeydFeK8KODI Pw==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.152]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp03.apple.com with ESMTP id 327w4nud6q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:27:51 -0700
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.16]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.5.20200312 64bit (built Mar 12 2020)) with ESMTPS id <0QDF00RHD4IF4P00@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.rno.apple.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.5.20200312 64bit (built Mar 12 2020)) id <0QDF00Y004G1MY00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.rno.apple.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 6c61dd97954a042b63620aa4ba461abd
X-Va-E-CD: 3c40d629f78bd0203075d108426abf6a
X-Va-R-CD: 6cd5f201762aabfe01892943406f23ce
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: b725838f-69a5-4c69-b084-a0aead182511
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 6c61dd97954a042b63620aa4ba461abd
X-V-E-CD: 3c40d629f78bd0203075d108426abf6a
X-V-R-CD: 6cd5f201762aabfe01892943406f23ce
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: abbf49b1-1d97-4fbd-96a3-d622bf48026f
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-13_15:2020-07-13, 2020-07-13 signatures=0
Received: from [17.234.17.151] (unknown [17.234.17.151]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.5.20200312 64bit (built Mar 12 2020)) with ESMTPSA id <0QDF00ZLS4IEOK00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp03.rno.apple.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.7.2.3\))
Subject: Re: On diversity in the NomCom
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <D93CB255-893F-46B6-AA48-8ED2ECB44BDC@huitema.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:27:50 -0700
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <57FA12AF-0309-487E-A8D0-161C4B05100F@apple.com>
References: <5E5A5C4C-854A-4F5A-8692-195828752A51@gmail.com> <D93CB255-893F-46B6-AA48-8ED2ECB44BDC@huitema.net>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.7.2.3)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-13_15:2020-07-13, 2020-07-13 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jFsoKVGW5R89_n0-N_Mj_qJRs8Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:28:07 -0000

> On Jul 13, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 13, 2020, at 6:37 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> That is an interesting point, though I am not sure of the specifics of the proposal.
>> 
>> The IETF is very tribal along area lines with too little interaction between the tribes. Some consideration of areas of interest would be useful in Nomcom so that the special issues that effect the areas are better understood by those taking the decisions. Now I know they can ask, but some background context helps a lot.
> 
> I don't think we are that tribal. Look at the QUIC WG happily mixing contributions from application, transport and security experts, with management also debated. I am sure there are other examples.

> 
> -- Christian Huitema 

+1

Lots of the best work we do is spread across the fuzzy boundaries between areas.

Areas have changed over the years, and I’d be reticent to see these areas institutionalized to the point that people choose “primary” affiliations. I certainly wouldn’t want to have to choose an affiliation.

The NomCom talks to the community of contributors in each area, and listens to that feedback as the way to determine who is best suited for each role.

Best,
Tommy