Re: On diversity in the NomCom

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 15 July 2020 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F5B3A0966 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVa4erG1sVz2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98BCA3A09E1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F547548047; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:57:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 27547440043; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:57:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:57:55 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: On diversity in the NomCom
Message-ID: <20200715155755.GC56304@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <7429392e-a411-4c40-8fa9-f03de558b7ca@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CAChr6Sweag6G2sfdOrpGUZnPybK4eqn-EHFVHMgSv5V+MtHcow@mail.gmail.com> <d3187a20-76a8-0ef9-d32f-6b8e400a0d30@gmail.com> <ee517835-1ad4-e2c0-a33b-e194f7c37f95@gmail.com> <CAChr6SxXwKwwtXxL+9f2Zz8kufpnOLmHHkK-dY6PC+k9mNE4+w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SxXwKwwtXxL+9f2Zz8kufpnOLmHHkK-dY6PC+k9mNE4+w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/o4yA7XzyDkhucBandroBKR9dKiA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:58:01 -0000

I disagree. The absence of in-person meeting is quite disruptive IMHO.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 01:51:01AM -0700, Rob Sayre wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 1:57 PM Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Nevertheless, the fact is that big
> > companies can (and do) send more people, and provide more sponsorship
> > (such as hosting meetings, and funding Area Directors), than small
> > companies. If they didn't get something back for that, they would
> > complain, or simply withdraw their resources.
> >
> 
> This seems like one of those things that might not "return to normal".
> 
> IETF work seems to be proceeding fine without people flying long distances
> to sit in a hotel conference room and look at their laptops.
> 
> thanks,
> Rob