IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: On diversity in the NomCom

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 14 July 2020 06:59 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F113A1184 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 23:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3aTzgSGMDFOZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 23:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B4593A1183 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 23:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id b9so6636160plx.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 23:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C756cgcV32C5vqPrSMhS3kMLLpi0frmiNqRpZYCY9lU=; b=Nd8C2MrLBvLssFgLn3pEBQpvrWfYCBA0UHVH5yEEXVD1XShxGhU48SR7tNc+5rXB2F IkWfwarskeV5V/Mc69w4lCzzKRF1K7hWMoM5a9+7pCpsxh5UxM4V2ezFV9H8sduhAj7E LF2mQqAoJAaQoXR+P5y0d3rQroRxvT0KZz2Np4NTk5XRNKiUDqCuajP1VoU4rUYmWE82 cNfuWFSYScQWjFMbVpzlvEPDLtciLZMLJGj0tQtPOpT853h/obOC5VygTDYJGYuy1DsV AX4waAj6unngUrV+vwVbeNYrfCraC53FhL14gFcq78o5PfdsNwoHtVzSwq7ygf6NzK1z c5DA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=C756cgcV32C5vqPrSMhS3kMLLpi0frmiNqRpZYCY9lU=; b=N86DuOiIL24NjrtcVx1HzOFjI8vxQ2rVSrkqmBaWsBX1nvJMvfPrg0GaDBicf0Ug2h q+9Ewac/gHht9HWefsgFqmu151lCTDFmt743PqckKFuzDWQTQfzvcoKwxrRxOKSLub5R DH+7G0Afs1EVPym6uw8KBiY7sLUHfC94NKtuFQf5lMN2bjomls+qbGM73BnAbmw+Ci0R HrEcYDeJNeuoa7wZsc4u0+UM3qzldAROf6kYJI6ZSW85siyCZ3Oj0COSPMRd62a/xmhB XD9sStTfl93NNPCBA+8N7HPGnMjxj6RiparzbttzplBAxzj+56deMpo48V9PmCjN3Lb/ 4wKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mS13GYCGHSnJSBebrQEQNCYnMzIQoe+YqOC532m0N8RF0x8J9 QyL+jWIoEYB4AQ3aTzLwqdE8DfNc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjKSkd3r56l1PkFYIfvKOG0FQUPA9F/+SLw9YRD+/Y+Z+T/vp5d60BS3uF7SbgwGAtC5Eluw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c40c:: with SMTP id k12mr2678333plk.11.1594709972347; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 23:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aspen.local (63-140-73-54-rb1.jnu.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.73.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w18sm14758172pgj.31.2020.07.13.23.59.30 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 23:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: On diversity in the NomCom
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <7429392e-a411-4c40-8fa9-f03de558b7ca@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CAChr6Sweag6G2sfdOrpGUZnPybK4eqn-EHFVHMgSv5V+MtHcow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d3187a20-76a8-0ef9-d32f-6b8e400a0d30@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 22:59:29 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sweag6G2sfdOrpGUZnPybK4eqn-EHFVHMgSv5V+MtHcow@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mHFtKtRnzThE5ymWZZu1RIOlrTs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 06:59:34 -0000

On 7/13/20 10:41 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> I was able to attribute at least 63 of 143 volunteers to just four
> companies.

Might be interesting to look at how well that reflects meeting
attendance.  My guess is that it's disproportionate (having over
500 people at a 1200-person meeting come from those 4 companies
"feels" incorrect) but that's just a guess.

Melinda

-- 
Melinda Shore
melinda.shore@gmail.com

Software longa, hardware brevis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email