RE: IETF 97 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Open Now!

"Roni Even" <> Fri, 12 August 2016 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B8712D8F2 for <>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywjlSimeru7S for <>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FAE412D779 for <>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id o80so12523951wme.1 for <>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=BPO+EYH4pbq/QwwhvYkx5OfE18tXd48YE/ght0uYMMg=; b=f9eud0UDMxLWidjGOwwgJ8t+UioJyMahlde0+Ogku+rUh5pLC0Jm+thrJymxLfgz7r F7jxDtM8H+sh7yMLge5XXyIF3AzO4PgUUIZ/sA9N8Igd/FY9bh1GNkgyiA/2s82Ml6bO QzMe4t0V1Rb1yzO+YyjMnjaVq+Y18Koo/x6ZApwmjPbX8wVfAZkqCWc0Msr2EeyA3pjR 7cfNvQSxYi8Ks2+uHxSeEwyAgsU5FD7wiBzlvx+bmv4byL92JNZj81SifFj2MWoJgfXl sN6Kdm4sRWGADE2I8nZrcNuxuKjLkQhW1YSwUwk85yzwiCdOwE5SZu/M5G9IjEwlWkEg dWOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=BPO+EYH4pbq/QwwhvYkx5OfE18tXd48YE/ght0uYMMg=; b=Fztyk30OqNlIx0pJST1GC8ZMsJjYCgN2gm3xD9ZNHA6EhIppzJUPbLsJ1gRvA5ce8n xB1ut4ESj9FPpHXDnhZWrI8sW5bBIexrmRvCYnlasGDgl9JnNr5eZWTGGawrPPejhwnL AvJ6Jbdl+4HBvItGrURFiz0KoKE5uNHTYbWJAwOysPn1FwP2AdbXMuE8Lo7oHCPdc6E6 3oImAaOUEuuLq1YI4Tw+PlWGhvKpnHj+5jqC2FrGiQhSTIRccUt09ZZL5soccOpHBNyn XugWjZKIcTrHS1P0G7Ox02tjhiWy7a6Or1P7NuReFkBThlJLEUTfnhMPtS8i7WUkGqqa 5fLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv4EnaxSx431eKjJvKIXX2yrK8Lyks2aJ49xLvQUofamGpTi+crA8Odr7vg+scu7g==
X-Received: by with SMTP id jg7mr13548546wjb.166.1470984151531; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniPC ( []) by with ESMTPSA id kq2sm6004115wjc.41.2016. (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Roni Even" <>
To: "'Christer Holmberg'" <>, <>, <>
References: <> <> <9916BCD4DBD65FB7D44A6F88@JcK-HP8200>, <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Subject: RE: IETF 97 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Open Now!
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:42:15 +0300
Message-ID: <036801d1f464$aaf1df20$00d59d60$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0369_01D1F47D.D0400180"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJFa1xJ9IbPeSyQm/k+zbmyApMxAgEb+nC9AfQy9o4BhKXEQAHfNOdOnypSJnA=
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 06:42:35 -0000

Christer thanks

It worked for me even though the room and rate were not the same in both

Roni Even


From: ietf [] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: IETF 97 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Open Now!



When I checked 12th-19th it said the IETF rate was sold out. But, when I
tried 12th-18th the IETF rate was available. Then, when I tried 18th-19th
and the IETF rate was also available.



Sent from my Windows Phone


From: Dave Crocker <> 
Sent: ‎12/‎08/‎2016 05:44
Subject: Re: IETF 97 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Open Now!

> I was considering actually coming to that meeting, but, at circa
> USD 450/room/night including taxes... not likely.

If anyone considers not staying at the primary hotel as a basic reason 
not to attend an IETF meeting, there almost certainly are deeper issues 
to worry about.

On the other hand, if there are no rooms at a 'reasonable' rate and with 
sufficiently convenient access to the venue, then that's a 
straightforward and serious IAOC problem, because it isn't supposed to 
happen... It used to be an issue but the staff and meetings committee 
attend to it rather carefully, these days, in my direct experience.


   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking