Re: IETF 97 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Open Now!

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 12 August 2016 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C339F12D14A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bt_coEioRnGn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED0C12B059 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id i5so57695335wmg.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YtTgCReGS2G1hVmgfQEXHQuEEhve9hmuESUw9iKsM7c=; b=hgiWQgVh7J1rcJXfgMIi93GOfLX/NNVdXHP6w9XJiXxKf8vxtdlye8+c5Zi5+YasvJ t8eLKSkzlKpQVZItBCaHhw2NQHdIGyYYqiuVL4yUOvIqmue0arOtDpBhoXKukwqjyV4O EBRJgDLF1UHovQRQ68QQ1FQhGAG2o/WxdQN6moZ07tpNkxwuwg8Dpl3qHAWOejNOaVmx IIvqovULq8PwCdeIi2nWDbo6BgHMRMyg5v2nAw/xMeZ16JexMAxaFBQ5sqLTmFMDZkFM yNtPHg1cC8cDYrkkWUw2M0tIPamP4VBZGgHvSAcmaMVooOu8MQN51PJQBZJV7x4knOvr 5G1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YtTgCReGS2G1hVmgfQEXHQuEEhve9hmuESUw9iKsM7c=; b=c+cGIOPMPuAIYcJwBFQVARATLBFsiIhvgLp9rV/K3ORLy+3OG3MrIOf4Nz7rLjaD0J 7t/1Sb99pFJFB7Ie+9QS4mNFxEW345Om7Iml9UCy41lwP1tRnpknXCnfFtuefZ2Gx4/X KamKxmduT0VbUkRaks/15w8VPINWwUgsTB1+b9YlKaLJzeCZPoe5D0ARnX7+GF3Yc1ot aYb2/aaeBZnd8oacNebvFwfHyu8irAv/JFXsROm7ykHx7zuNV/Hd6Wm7DCNvMNoLZKdf +UMHRGT6Z5LUujfP//WI5vyujo+qPeRAWz7YzPpvyhQ/U2pdUnfyZtvSstXec4CIVSSZ WtMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous3QiXw/IVbTFnjmPLCkmUnoFZHR5iYuZcGZHEm7s/+ox/m2zrDctbLix4mQNC7nTL+Vg2vGEabGKqIAw==
X-Received: by 10.25.131.150 with SMTP id f144mr2875125lfd.53.1471035527511; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3fe84e04-7ccf-6fd8-1622-eb1417631305@dcrocker.net>
References: <147094744424.21281.7915555432277043072.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <57AD2730.8050602@swin.edu.au> <9916BCD4DBD65FB7D44A6F88@JcK-HP8200> <953016d5-6f64-bd94-c221-95d96f693c2c@dcrocker.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BBDEDF4@ESESSMB208.ericsson.se> <036801d1f464$aaf1df20$00d59d60$@gmail.com> <42234065-1C6E-4224-A48C-1186F536E02F@piuha.net> <82A17B2FC06D1F8BD216D229@JcK-HP8200> <58ceaef5-77fc-5833-a7a0-c5eae8ed21a3@dcrocker.net> <2CD7D393-7ADD-4739-A923-79B0EBE6EB76@gmail.com> <3fe84e04-7ccf-6fd8-1622-eb1417631305@dcrocker.net>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:58:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mbZ1V_f_FBZUQSxTOVV0L4q2Y=4MskzYp81tgWbbrTsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 97 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Open Now!
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f20b811d48e0539e626f2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2NgBdzc7iAUXqtTe6nyFaDsdQLE>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 20:58:51 -0000

As someone mentioned earlier, the Conrad simply doesn't have all that many
rooms.   So the answer is that we would have had to have chosen a different
conference hotel.

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

>
> The way it works at the moment seems to be that if you are lucky
>> enough to be doing an email check at the right time and book at once
>> you are OK, otherwise you miss out
>>
>
>
> I've been wondering about how to approach this topic in a way that makes
> sense for the IETF list and it occurs to me that it might be worth
> remembering that our industry is based on statistical multiplexing, and
> that's about probabilities and timing...
>
>    If we make sure there is a room for everyone who might want one, we
> will allocate too many and will waste quite a bit of money, due to the
> guarantees we have to make to the hotel.
>
>    So for practical purposes the room block needs to be of a size that is
> likely to be exceeded... at some point... almost always.
>
>    Currently, that 'some point' is measured in minutes, or at best small
> numbers of hours.
>
>    My question, therefore, is how large must the window be, before all the
> rooms typically sell out?
>
>
> d/
> --
>
>   Dave Crocker
>   Brandenburg InternetWorking
>   bbiw.net
>
> --
>
>   Dave Crocker
>   Brandenburg InternetWorking
>   bbiw.net
>
>