IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EXT] Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet standards

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891E83A1D76 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U766IXLWI7UI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85E1E3A1D75 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF736A268; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:00:54 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1585641654; bh=W2J4ZywVgtB9evDgyrB/9RBcaGVgNc/tlXNb6H1KhV0=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=F7G3okt25RUwLHsf2ssvwU/Jboe/PTFKTpHeIaN3B/5NPpx1xFsGly0KIAMVKgm+R VM530VSx/DCBnaLsHgqIgqeRbP8madbIMTCgHTnkKd35eqv6zHefeI7ZpZiQ3pqB8w lI1T/Re2NsxQHsBrwDh/FjgmZNEEVzz/5aEZ3U6V61srCL0a7R8IrUTm699bH1rZn3 7/U7hPMRmZ0MCej6vm50Fj6V1JDLGvwIruxUuIvSmn/41s7KZ+uDj8fJem61xKYMnS Fo/13HsFNNLWrffIRjmkFMp6ZpA2DNm+GJv9RugN/I/4ML5/WVG9T9cz0VfEacbqhe iRt6FlVP2tsag==
Received: from appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com (appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FC283C035A; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:00:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:00:54 +0200
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <372986510.4614.1585641654495@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <71ddd912-9067-a29f-e33f-473b1608eb8d@network-heretics.com>
References: <68ab4f9e057d49b0972f97a907f45ced@elvas.europol.eu.int> <4668b6f7-cf7e-b577-3ece-30d1bdf3a4bc@network-heretics.com> <713270061.4157.1585575906743@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com> <71ddd912-9067-a29f-e33f-473b1608eb8d@network-heretics.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet standards
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev0
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ah3u8cmvmTkGWjCdjwSwYFrt5ww>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:01:00 -0000


> Il 30/03/2020 16:07 Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> ha scritto:
> 
>  
> On 3/30/20 9:45 AM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> 
> > For example, privileging encryption over security is a policy choice.
> 
> That's a false dichotomy.   Security is not enhanced, but weakened, by 
> giving governments back-door access, and there is plenty of technical 
> justification for that.

That is your opinion, and incidentally it is also mine, but it is not the opinion of a whole lot of non-technical professionals and experts in the law enforcement field, and even of some technical experts, otherwise "eTLS" would not exist and would not have been approved as a technical standard at another well respected standards organization. Those people are not incompetent, those people prefer a different tradeoff between multiple policy objectives.

In any case, my discourse was much more general, so apologies for mentioning that specific case, it was just meant as an example, not to reopen a discussion from the past.

-- 
 
Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com 
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email