Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5803A1BFC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUtLGP69EGX8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from camel.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (camel.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0303F3A1BFB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC7D340F91; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:15:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-87-40.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.87.40]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8BCDF340E35; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:15:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.6); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:15:22 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Absorbed-Tank: 6f0c98e060a0857a_1585635321886_3852093190
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1585635321886:2905914880
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1585635321886
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266A7B26AC; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=svjkjmA9V7mJxO +deNWr+267mOA=; b=hZTeuqjakwvnxFqbd97f4Vk4v0/tXic1sAHaH2S+9C+AP6 Kx8OKT8GEmoJtPM52G+TYULzlEuensnNEhnmPKak3vzfWg008X0VPR9gLlELZU/D lGJMQDsPTRqg8kd9U+V9gqTGXAYjtz9AkOIFgxofmyvafvE22eHkqvAwkZyZc=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4F12B26B7; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:15:15 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a18
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Message-ID: <20200331061514.GS18021@localhost>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <20200331060238.GR18021@localhost> <DEE8329D-9990-494A-AC78-E9C971255F27@episteme.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DEE8329D-9990-494A-AC78-E9C971255F27@episteme.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudeiiedguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecukfhppedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpihhnvghtpedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtohepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FKycI2H7Dce5Mvvm_CnQrmDhpnY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:15:25 -0000

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:10:22AM -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2020, at 1:02, Nico Williams wrote:
> > A last call *is* a normal period of discussion.  Sure, there would be no
> > preceding discussion, but that's OK -- the minimum time is 4 weeks, and
> > you've got 28 days + two to spare.
> 
> Note that there has already been 2 weeks of "preceding discussion". The top
> of this thread is March 13.

So, there's 2 days to produce an I-D, and 28 days to run an IETF LC.
Plenty!

This thread alone would be the LC discussion... if only there were an
I-D.