Re: Venue for post-IETF 107 Nomcom eligibility discussion (was: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107)

Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org> Mon, 16 March 2020 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <weiler@w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB753A0CEB; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wteKogzt17iX; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.107.128.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7486C3A0CEA; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from celebrae2015mbp (c-24-60-30-211.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.60.30.211]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F2DE6707E; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:39:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:39:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: gendispatch-chairs@ietf.org, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Venue for post-IETF 107 Nomcom eligibility discussion (was: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107)
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eR8V=1mfvkww+DMOhzsUizkDvPyiaoHSy94DYDYor+EA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.20.2003161237510.772@celebrae2015mbp>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200313162255.GB8656@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20200313204317.GR21734@vurt.meerval.net> <CAA=duU0jN0y12_HpzzK73BRD+x19ZQn74V=ju2_wwS-RUL_9Yw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+r2OrFVbZj=3fTRUapkDkxap2T-p+QzNfaqK4N0c+haQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-eR8V=1mfvkww+DMOhzsUizkDvPyiaoHSy94DYDYor+EA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (OSX 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="0-1230714353-1584376768=:772"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qnUittLdMnnDY32IAdb2jGtINHA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:39:32 -0000

On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:

> For what it's worth, there's already an "IETF-Nomcom" discussion mailing list, intended for just such
> conversations, at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom.
> 
> Is there a recommendation whether we use that list, or gendispatch, or something else? I'm assuming
> everyone is hoping for more than just a new thread on the IETF discussion list ...

We have a list dedicated to the purpose that has been seeing traffic:

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss

-- Sam