Re: Venue for post-IETF 107 Nomcom eligibility discussion (was: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 16 March 2020 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698EC3A0DFA; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=KdzLnrBt; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=y5KuEds4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezyJqpXh9o55; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB01D3A0DF8; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DF95C03C7; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 13:40:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 13:40:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=l wg7dGhXxgGYGfpnl7roY9eDfPtjbwhnGRICZMFLkfc=; b=KdzLnrBtBlypZX4V8 GzUY5E9neYIi1+Sm3q7pkFu2r8e/pMX2vQ2OWkDZ9KxEP66GDjCwwFjj9y8gfmUh sIlZxNWce5novnth2rKGYOI3QdP9RZwNhOLi7F+OLaaVwKaKzNt/wkLdxblY89g7 2BbGNx/47LiSXOaIkLvr97Yf3LtxCF2F7HzWkgLJ7P8i0x2CF98QjPcKhH/wwUqB xOYsozLVtW+O7FnjCBKx/xuGBi7QGqT1VQDjuqVdl/1ly9hpjOPEvU2VFzD14tw6 Anxu1BV2lsVAL1nTXH8w90E1Vdpb5Koh4By+E64w9oNPstcFujuoGy7kUn1BmdqO kJmkA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=lwg7dGhXxgGYGfpnl7roY9eDfPtjbwhnGRICZMFLk fc=; b=y5KuEds44HaTEfdrkl0dqFur1SHinqwIQOVqGGfCQY17uGj3trIhJlkOT hdNSXnT8xj13VhNSUg6opZ2eLq+TZxU7WZrW3ZR4qKrtJdEVhT2n/ex/qiD7GPTp W+9ojoYCYWsUZqsoE94zU4MckhnUhINeDIFPh2LhjoaQWKymwPU7fbuqs1qHhWz4 z32Y3Iw+rrI8RA+NYn3w/GECb7xCzRZ5y69RBQuN99oqX6Xkieyd0vhrl9oAlRFt z55HljdHjaTDaRnj4nfqlR4VfRlceXDq/LrCtPhaf1pmmGCmBLBcFxBc2cR/XjoT 4PxenW/0rqOWjDWom6+8eOpp6HEIw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JbpvXl25fC1gMhFy7ilRUWMPSFTADa6WiHrMjtouayl-qAq7sN6RZw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudeffedguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhi shhsrgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomh grihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdekudenucevlhhu shhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestg hoohhpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JbpvXpwzzG87X4Qev1Z_syTGfQMmjzj6CkyhdzTzL2y_UVsIzgeTMQ> <xmx:JbpvXgW4e6zs6IhhivVbPv2ZhWisBSYp77ZhRwFVjQE_NAGgKTNdxA> <xmx:JbpvXrD5Z5yBVFR9961WsglnvNS0Xb1FcYlH3I_jwYwnCJZy6YlkVw> <xmx:JrpvXoWU7YTGzqWQzuHGymwLkNLeFs1r1u8PjIKrAowHt7PZsvudUg>
Received: from rtp-vpn3-317.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.81]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7992F306218B; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 13:40:53 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: Venue for post-IETF 107 Nomcom eligibility discussion (was: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.20.2003161237510.772@celebrae2015mbp>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 13:40:52 -0400
Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, gendispatch-chairs@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <43D5C798-0AF2-4D57-BB8C-1CE2FAAB238F@cooperw.in>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200313162255.GB8656@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20200313204317.GR21734@vurt.meerval.net> <CAA=duU0jN0y12_HpzzK73BRD+x19ZQn74V=ju2_wwS-RUL_9Yw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+r2OrFVbZj=3fTRUapkDkxap2T-p+QzNfaqK4N0c+haQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-eR8V=1mfvkww+DMOhzsUizkDvPyiaoHSy94DYDYor+EA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.2003161237510.772@celebrae2015mbp>
To: Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bLT0v0JAwIGEFFAgCUmW4jBio_g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:40:57 -0000


> On Mar 16, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> 
>> For what it's worth, there's already an "IETF-Nomcom" discussion mailing list, intended for just such
>> conversations, at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom.
>> Is there a recommendation whether we use that list, or gendispatch, or something else? I'm assuming
>> everyone is hoping for more than just a new thread on the IETF discussion list ...
> 
> We have a list dedicated to the purpose that has been seeing traffic:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss

Let’s keep it there since threads there have already begun.

Thanks,
Alissa

> 
> -- Sam