Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 02 April 2020 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B823A1A16 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ik7s19fbiBfj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA273A1A0F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id e1so1827647plt.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GjO1Ml7nWQAlFstT7/mEACS9RZm9OfEvzE4eud1rAfI=; b=QbXCTxvCWWohwi4zHL8A87+ofOs/tvqmfPlM8XibvbdTRHFfmBJOZ3kNUQVglzKMYW +JR+sHvIAqgdVZsIXfo4J8rRspDyopoSS0JXIxJGfiC1sBcBBLKUcso/wYamP3RIRWJw csxyp7eY9mE3tbaD+LzBcDR0je8TGeTI9DlcmoJPXM8rQVGO8wZltiBMoMfm4vnOGAmp KAacNoA7zXH/ydwMu1wPPQNLZxqVz9uMM/8iBbMTpm37JkGXgQi8pjlpW0UGi9CnIKKE FK6K9aNOe1b1lc+nhdkJngUbrXIAyKMegMciLTx2wsMmiK8YWVeVKHkeWjl+SsJUxOWO z7Tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GjO1Ml7nWQAlFstT7/mEACS9RZm9OfEvzE4eud1rAfI=; b=Tp0SD5vCR1VQhB8YkOpoLyB9ZkL9dQWA/lATBad9CcksI1h6LqX3ocPvzxwvQi3JhM a4B9hV+Q4AlvhZJgX+7PX0M8W2XvjXxhdjCUw1XLorBQi+MS8rdjKTCATVO2xUfkNWg6 KJm0UehJdK/hHQN1faJie65dVwgIEOFhpUu+dzkIluIqo1qh0YzRC/lsnapEtFnXkn+c o/n6K/3sNJ8SzjdEZecbD9UtHU3LeH7Rr8X0cL4VDIipSRkyVzlazUBcWV+5ssSVhEMN B2ap0/LCWM+hLuIaHSRXF574B7d0jiw6vugoYc5tvdqJ4CkKwucmHkeH6lXnPSBDpGH1 1GVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYAeuiDMxjCIN4IYAohbMbVlfLPpP7dlWLjW+r63bu/ZbWVln4J NAC+UjyitmDYPEsTKWzSo+DbFln+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypICc9UW8aEm1c1UnBGvz92ezfQetuPuvfPtBXKHI/SbMmJKlJsn6TKi/Nrr9cbgqPe6J4WCbQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:be0b:: with SMTP id a11mr6052663pjs.56.1585862508421; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm4470351pjc.32.2020.04.02.14.21.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <89730DD8-0451-4658-A0CD-83A85E2055FE@episteme.net> <0C31D020-46FA-424E-8FFD-64BBE8F952E9@cooperw.in> <1E702B62-9982-48F2-B8D6-F4F80A8DE168@episteme.net> <20200331184236.GT18021@localhost> <CALaySJ+_+-kf+3nta8LwMiwPmqPmRdOgC7KAnDfeDgx0ThVa-w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+27gcT6x5BcKU1YHHv+xeaXDnxPU0yhtBSULb36VpFWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBy7iVT4NVLw14+=a1ksWrg35q+dsKfs+9r2poiVo3wkg@mail.gmail.com> <0FC773BE-7B20-402C-AC7E-183A321741E0@gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBjTjOWLMTFvM50DR2piOLQ4jniXTWPunOoMfvdkOzvXw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f46284c0-3cdf-1459-bc72-d0504a04b3ad@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:21:43 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBjTjOWLMTFvM50DR2piOLQ4jniXTWPunOoMfvdkOzvXw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/If4TLDVWpoCyafPAVW06vIA_UKY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 21:21:52 -0000

On 03-Apr-20 06:15, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> I read the draft and I support it.
> 
> Thanks, Bob.
> 
>> One nit:  Should it say that it updates BCP10?
> 
> I think it should not, but should be its own BCP.
> 
> We need a broader effort to update BCP 10, but this is a one-time
> exception.  Publishing it as a BCP is a process formality, but sets no
> precedent and won't apply after this year's NomCom is seated.  I think
> it would be wrong for it to formally update BCP 10.

Fully agree. And the draft is fine by me.

     Brian