Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80B93A079B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dvyy1xBAu2ng for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB6543A079D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id q19so10612477ljp.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UyOEvEUw9yBO755j/nKb7nlipFq9+sttrwqdyZ9DIN8=; b=XLgQbCfuzmvXWzT03jjvNoEVdz/nKeqO1196q3lsvxNIx7Mabuvn75YqCYnTPFSHyZ LYjtVQ5UrQH2WN1b2UaU0Wfmpu7cPUF4HUk17CRZWe+t9Dh2V/cEh3x/RqMGYSZo5lUb N7fzWbm9xjFy4u+2WuGSdCJRrTU86ApJwsRlMKFiZ/4KcQqRTFZ9oL8S1xN5CKHtCETG oNE3qvkYtqqfA6SrPlAMcw7rhLK/M2+t5iHKHQBsLKMDrmgH3nxuMSuy0hclziGqInUV Q4QeCWG4kgzoiCNSyrkTOJo0chvJW7s+5ua8E9LFy4IPFmipPtwZqOQg6njrv4lcci5o O6fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UyOEvEUw9yBO755j/nKb7nlipFq9+sttrwqdyZ9DIN8=; b=rN8Eflfd1NMa2aBP6NDt/zVmKEzD6IT5I/SY2e3Z4BjMrRujFrW5rU+M/PS+eCVEXr hWZkgy/Eck/iAn66xkqehFfP2rr/xrM4UJTWpu3RTSXD8mbyYnkHuTskR2v7WXZ2RGtR S25U+HvPJE888d+u2rJgxAw28lXsxc6/mmH0t1JatA3bRBywTlteJCwvPh9kF9G814+r P563k6It75Ho0qYuidYchOcYiPm+g8qimgP44+kmkF+BKMmjdwSQkEq8bbuu4D/23Wzy UpjyWcKfIi6vVF1+jBrjSOrnhdBYrNes90vfAqFjVk47jPfiO/76glr+30HtCJSr2fHo blUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2i8k3SKD6dTHfq69xbVpjHMUUr8L8k8tbvU4V2T+bPr0UwlnAV tPp5oJ3iyIVUn5PcVUAA98AzRrd6rdqBmCsAUmLIf6OF+zg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vs9NHknDKiNbjVhKorH7VU8P/4j9vbe2pKuMELC?= =?utf-8?q?+Qf9Wk6iRvCPRyFfmvdtOuxr1G3o4PxgQlbT2A4Dl9OnT4o=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0c9:: with SMTP id g9mr8039230ljl.120.1584108360728; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003130956090.13795@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003130956090.13795@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:05:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMR5OvWt1eX+zNJruHLJ4ADfpPyNaLmH1MwDcgJ86is-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002098ad05a0bcf85f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0AuS0vuqmQ_OHweX88q42q-Cwf8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:06:10 -0000

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:58 AM Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> > One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
> > eligibility.  The last five meetings would then be 106, 105, 104, 103,
> > and 102, and one would have had to attend three of those to be
> > eligible this year.
>
> This makes sense to me.
>
> > Another choice is to consider 107 to be a meeting that everyone has
> > attended
>
> This makes no sense to me.
>

I concur with Paul. Ignoring 107 seems to do the best job at fulfilling the
spirit of the rule.

-Ekr


> Paul
>
>