IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 01 April 2020 00:29 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC36F3A0E2C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bAptuCf7hH84 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-f178.google.com (mail-il1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE1A3A0E2E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-f178.google.com with SMTP id i75so14055132ild.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9UgYWL2H0i5cipSFj6sWK5il/eaCfp76ZJgsrooYaFY=; b=M/n9bxqya1o9AWYA5CTsMXtZoX9VnLn9nhTBLPryXiW2ZbInk9GIMp4YrsmRD8iHg/ 1Zk3NPFN9l29bdXLM7doAZaVL6pagFRKXigvcQH62XCD89bzX9SjF4CReKKod0+8p9pj y8pZLDFpSW1bC7ymgWbFOWjdW/h87e7rd0LEdyChliS72zDKyu5PZ1tcNdBjwlT2KOBm tEXADCO+6QOCqCuJkyhwGR9/EdzyJa/e9Q4SN4ekv/aXGRrfdPdtZFGk8SCJ/WsnvMVh fB5HkpFoYqHO++OaTJVxy+IK24a+D1x+4h0Q7aK8cMLfRhZfv7jcZ0IARmol03PxC6F3 0l7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3Q0Igep5JEtJBaFo5y35mtxP4es/y51tTBdmjJ0OCnxEkxTsFi AmlBViv4ui1XxqrLuRA+iQxWLL5xl8T4rXsL+3uZZ9vj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuN6PGiBUpUJApaEwfhLHAe5KUtA7VhA4aVXNQJ/qx+i7pP3wcmhMht8lcL5dvKN6KlYnd25tzZ25Zvel8I4LQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:35db:: with SMTP id c88mr18879946ilf.187.1585700961921; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <89730DD8-0451-4658-A0CD-83A85E2055FE@episteme.net> <0C31D020-46FA-424E-8FFD-64BBE8F952E9@cooperw.in> <1E702B62-9982-48F2-B8D6-F4F80A8DE168@episteme.net> <20200331184236.GT18021@localhost> <CALaySJ+_+-kf+3nta8LwMiwPmqPmRdOgC7KAnDfeDgx0ThVa-w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+27gcT6x5BcKU1YHHv+xeaXDnxPU0yhtBSULb36VpFWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-db9ys5nPQEUyocNm3VcR5ZDeSP_GTE1Gmp17tUxjMe1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-db9ys5nPQEUyocNm3VcR5ZDeSP_GTE1Gmp17tUxjMe1w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:29:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLht0Y5P4C4YUKqyfYHQSaH9vuL4Z5k4suv1=abuWbhYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Fj2brlgf1JULlPPKF_x4o7pxYvA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 00:29:24 -0000

> I'd suggest this for the last sentence:
>
>    Because no IETF 107 in-person was held, for the 2020-2021 Nominating Committee those five meetings are
>    IETFs 102, 103, 104, 105, and 106.
>
>> The question I will ask is this: Is there anyone who *can't live with
>> that outcome*?
>
> I could live with that, either with or without my suggested text, of course.

With, indeed; your suggestion makes sense.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email