IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDB23A0FAE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m9liNgcT0XSC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 851AC3A0F8E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1jCrKu-0007uy-Ph; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:55:16 +0000
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:55:13 -0700
Message-ID: <m2ftecasb2.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR15MB2644FF1C26258129CC6ED06797FA0@BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <75d49afa-9b3d-5e81-a254-2559588b25d2@cs.tcd.ie> <m2lfo4b0g0.wl-randy@psg.com> <BN8PR15MB2644FF1C26258129CC6ED06797FA0@BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/g1Q1BInGw5EgwVQ7p55fiZzfjRU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:55:20 -0000

> Electronic attendance taking is both easier and more reliable than
> blue-sheets.
> 
>> i suspect, similar to the A/V technology, we will need to develop
>> attendance taking technology.

i'll be interested in the sec cons for it

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email