Re: Venue for post-IETF 107 Nomcom eligibility discussion (was: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 March 2020 01:45 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08853A1545; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FwdZBME7mqQj; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E698D3A1544; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id r7so20950376ljp.10; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PRLVYiHuN1zQRX6YuD1VFqykrQNL8vgXLH4mxI/g5Og=; b=oSqEjSFdKO0O5u0kavkllmgfTMRHXcdYOC4hjSbf04nY45nz2ZRLajyoJD21NmJJ+p JQSIkv77Wu1Q2HL0JSsBFqPBazxNWj7S3/iufaSHTdwcXTSCuHBE/tdzH39zHtoadVra 7MK+cTA5wEISnOf+oFioSYHkmRJtSdKlEtSvh3/XtXNfUDGsVJ5iXAv2wlKpzR2Zh2ik eErQoeXGjSd8rpobt25EyJ/fYrcfYdmK5EGgnFHygd/IfvYRyAV3R7JWJK0Dk0PfH031 vQai3jr6B0Rwm96pEK39W2W1sUXK+C+xoiEPFP+M2fK7I98DusF+xpGkhPPoQPO6yRGl GGmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PRLVYiHuN1zQRX6YuD1VFqykrQNL8vgXLH4mxI/g5Og=; b=n8WbHjwv2e0+FSwUCkPLW+W0YZlIgx9sOZdMQl5ijaKnmOSReiQHqSK3OvLaGqDc3+ hZhXYUtCm2Tg3gZ4NuTjeXp3rsX3sJy538lhfq04hlcSNrERvJqwk9kE6Q+7yqoGLzMe mWbrIRwnlNwuaKLAZEqkCv7tPq1zlXGB83jLGzYgLWQIKxOdrTZFU+I1R6QpTP8UvMGJ 79knyxxemIS+xLDfLGItEAfT+bJfL2ByvTgsGzr5nk1LuWvqCG55fVlQegtd2m6NWUOq 2HenxLACfYsMq2sHxJZOpabwzalbqwctVPhg6iIi6+sl/Yhz9BAyU5//u3LzF8jg3KhN Mxow==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3yAT2iF7q2bsit9KD/8eI/EzG+5aHKmeFuKzbLamZrkN3CxOjU PwWAr0fhBBFt/xdtfVG333DPPDnRse9rjEBfAAw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuLHfHxyRaxfJfHptkxFRpxIHWwJ5Xr80Yund3Sry/2BnSua1uuU0Chx7cZE55xLPDq1ajfv8U0ZoJjCMzFj9c=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b8d3:: with SMTP id s19mr1263192ljp.222.1584409537117; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200313162255.GB8656@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20200313204317.GR21734@vurt.meerval.net> <CAA=duU0jN0y12_HpzzK73BRD+x19ZQn74V=ju2_wwS-RUL_9Yw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+r2OrFVbZj=3fTRUapkDkxap2T-p+QzNfaqK4N0c+haQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-eR8V=1mfvkww+DMOhzsUizkDvPyiaoHSy94DYDYor+EA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.2003161237510.772@celebrae2015mbp> <43D5C798-0AF2-4D57-BB8C-1CE2FAAB238F@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <43D5C798-0AF2-4D57-BB8C-1CE2FAAB238F@cooperw.in>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 20:45:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-emLs7+P2jxAagOpwVWRbpHx+5HttGyak_cmHS70n-VyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Venue for post-IETF 107 Nomcom eligibility discussion (was: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107)
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org>, gendispatch-chairs@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a37f9505a10317a2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Anm-SJBjlOA6FJdv4Y5FyU5bF6I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 01:45:45 -0000

Hi, Alissa and Sam,

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:40 PM Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

>
>
> > On Mar 16, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> >
> >> For what it's worth, there's already an "IETF-Nomcom" discussion
> mailing list, intended for just such
> >> conversations, at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom.
> >> Is there a recommendation whether we use that list, or gendispatch, or
> something else? I'm assuming
> >> everyone is hoping for more than just a new thread on the IETF
> discussion list ...
> >
> > We have a list dedicated to the purpose that has been seeing traffic:
> >
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss


Thanks. I'd never heard of this one :-)

Best,

Spencer


>
>
> Let’s keep it there since threads there have already begun.
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa
>
> >
> > -- Sam
>
>