Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151E93A2603 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YKrvWbwNDWld for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B1333A2605 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id z7so879190wmk.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JqsSLdMqHMSKVMNqC7ZcDbT2Y8Ut4bixR8qixsAgMys=; b=PYkx+UPFsQxTdSPSP7qOfLh3g7pJ3jcZHnJcQgOdP/A/wnkchts9xzicJQ0Su6a7Wm m8Yt64UO70egHSOMinsozCOwMkwxTT11nbJoGhZ47c6PrS0ma90cHUQQ+NBkJxJkkX6e yva6EkEG2Dq9GNRQ/F8vVulQAZLEvaGmExzrrrGiDgorfAxKMjOa50W+RoM3OZi7Hwqh sAsus+ncVnvvs0UcDIOfYZNlAYT0ZPWaunc5wEYaukcxeGzXujrhx7diVHJNntUxKOBh Wg5pzZMVTdxjRVwLvoS53+cTKgZoMhdBK3R+vZBuimKHakvoV9/suj8C9dU9H3bO6HRZ mQvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JqsSLdMqHMSKVMNqC7ZcDbT2Y8Ut4bixR8qixsAgMys=; b=SeP/6VgiN/s9Xtc9FXPRw4Q6Y4cNIgifouj6f0/8i0Aq4FLBUSsP4f06cXtD5fOE8l Q8cAI77fyRg5kN0oP/fvXAkLmdRabL/x086tg2OX2rNQbUZs0Pntmqz4P8j2zgAIhKPN BuAeQpSezLa+TpGNXmF9KWfXnIJMvyrH/q3O/f5WGVgSYNfgbMS8mnTTKcoxm4clninx wf7vpO+MXejaUnbdEBGfseQCfVHfCRJO0VnHbOMR+u5nhCKrsPxyoPK5XpbnGNSUc8b2 gKFYRcIDGVJwR8Px3h6aivGQFPbD2QoK7qWW/jRce6LH9CLtYLsl/E/adYjFGE33Ru1A XBYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZdzLtvb7u32rRxVRvqq1Dp1IYelKwuReyLO7pwcLvox/aKv28r kwRXjBsxnerAtVyk35o1L5E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL3aoDCfn3FiVXiMxcL1Wudbn8lTT8Wz0AERyg8qEwYCiVifN56619C44KDO/hc6ZOBZyVggg==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b4d4:: with SMTP id d203mr46262wmf.85.1585677679539; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x6sm4593523wmi.2.2020.03.31.11.01.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A74E1D2A-2937-46C5-AB50-FBE0C8625AF2@akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:01:15 +0300
Cc: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <923DCD28-7B33-4872-ADD5-57F0C7A58D4F@gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <89730DD8-0451-4658-A0CD-83A85E2055FE@episteme.net> <A74E1D2A-2937-46C5-AB50-FBE0C8625AF2@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/buUBNaLwxY0nF-8LVXhvPL2dQKU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:01:24 -0000

+1

> On 31 Mar 2020, at 17:15, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I strongly agree with what Pete and others have said.
> 
> Between this and the RFC-Ed WG decision, it's not a good month for the IETF. 
>