IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE37E3A0799 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LxdupUC_H3ei for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE303A078C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27BD21E97; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:32:41 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=43UXLRuJb/m/kYceDyx3w+7fUaJpstZYV7dd/92Gf i4=; b=tqs5zhoxR4hV0/sjid1PA0lm1+gBGBuuBngRjjEQLy6oJy4GyGZluViDs YGOwVvaLLFWs+80FGlZQ4ZM/PaSo7AQlZUjqEvsXF2UF4Ap04dw5ddvFZyQ5rDuw wHinSLktjtjbKu//XcDmnyrXJ6GnNiXVX/qDXRxN4a9ZTlkXmGpRSiqcRUtCt6Xj t/6Bw70gAHJ8390PLFp8/ugcYG43GiEe960l/DNt4jyUWCjZ5vGWRNLKdc0b0LJ3 z2NU7QZx0GqNe9WyM5rVTqE1r5irfPcF5wvDEJSGpIz85wb9IPVume9BepeVeWG9 TxFV8wEP0PrzuD3oSz4jWQ61gvFGw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:GRhsXvuhtvVuKoDA5rDcf3tCSWcD9Kd-HrQluKJBt-bqz5C2i6WJDQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddvkedguddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrud ehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhho ohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:GRhsXsxmWXP9AoIas-uzDubeJwROnIFvfUseWyzP5aRcAjS73bn8Ag> <xmx:GRhsXlgWeyqppOjJoC1bDcFRU5wTx3NWOGnGqDiakkSK3tNdnnbMWQ> <xmx:GRhsXgAzL26-AZkZYajYo_6aEQVKyos6Ya258W-ALSA5TEsGMdTa5w> <xmx:GRhsXp5xkAoPXc7tb7b5MZgFdBl8SBF8A106bU0tYA3D0Ys6VwjKFw>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 994163280060; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:32:40 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200313162255.GB8656@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20200313204317.GR21734@vurt.meerval.net> <CAA=duU0jN0y12_HpzzK73BRD+x19ZQn74V=ju2_wwS-RUL_9Yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <023ac7c5-58fe-1d02-caa6-67a43b2b54f9@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:32:39 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU0jN0y12_HpzzK73BRD+x19ZQn74V=ju2_wwS-RUL_9Yw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gwELZ82Sc7lNyVHnvvsmOkuA1Ws>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:32:54 -0000

On 3/13/20 7:25 PM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:

> The time has come to determine a criteria for including remote 
> attendees for NOMCOM eligibility. 

Maybe it could be based on the number of WG or independent stream draft 
documents an attendee thoroughly reviews?

(if we could define criteria for review thoroughness...)

Seems like the general idea should be that the people who invest in the 
work of the organization should be the ones on the NOMCOM.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email