IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [107all] Update on IETF 107 Vancouver and COVID-19

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Thu, 05 March 2020 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00143A135F; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 03:48:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FZOTW7_YwEeR; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 03:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C347A3A1332; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 03:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.155] (c-68-32-79-179.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.32.79.179]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14AE55401EC; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 06:48:20 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [107all] Update on IETF 107 Vancouver and COVID-19
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <213A9519-5989-498B-BAFA-390BC4E57960@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:48:19 -0500
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, "exec-director@ietf.org" <exec-director@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <0F96367D-8E26-44EC-B0DE-8314FA899D5F@puck.nether.net>
References: <213A9519-5989-498B-BAFA-390BC4E57960@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kGHJJtrdrXxU539g_bTH2P18yms>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 11:48:29 -0000

I'm expecting the hallway track will be more active. Many more cross area discussions. 

> On Mar 5, 2020, at 6:19 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> Interesting experiment: How well does the IETF work without the big companies around.
> 
> I share your concern, but in my immediate vicinity it seems we will still have a productive meeting — not as productive as it could be, but still worth meeting, even with a large remote participation component.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email