Re: [107all] Update on IETF 107 Vancouver and COVID-19

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 05 March 2020 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68913A148F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 05:24:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FwGm-r9fOscd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 05:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C4D3A148C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 05:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 025DOkL6004791 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:24:46 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id CFFBB203CE4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:24:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63FD203CB3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:24:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 025DOkxs012551 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:24:46 +0100
Subject: Re: [107all] Update on IETF 107 Vancouver and COVID-19
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <158335136585.29295.1109218817393181187@ietfa.amsl.com> <D4FDE701-CE29-44BE-877A-B45266FEFF08@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMG+OhM9_G3+ikfGxXSqi6PMO0EJeZ=vCC3Wne=YWHLLhg@mail.gmail.com> <B0D26E9A-0B21-49C3-9D48-EC2C638CB83D@gmail.com> <213A9519-5989-498B-BAFA-390BC4E57960@tzi.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b906f65e-d07a-8678-818e-39fc57aad1c7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:24:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <213A9519-5989-498B-BAFA-390BC4E57960@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tP3cOHSl-iJsVTM1hPh-N8ElyU4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:24:50 -0000


Le 05/03/2020 à 12:18, Carsten Bormann a écrit :
[...]
> It would be really useful if people who won’t come could transfer
> themselves from the local to the remote attendance part, in the
> attendance list or in a separate statistic.

This is a very good question.  I have been trapped by a wrong transition 
of meeting from f2f to online, where I am almost missing the online 
meeting which was transited from a f2f meeting, because I did not register.

The thing is the following: everyone should be treated as online by 
default.  Anyone should be able to join online.

It should not be like this: everyone who registered is allowed to join 
online.

It is the quintessence of how web sites are designed: they can be 
browsed by anyone.  That's how it grew.

I understand this might involve a change in the payment scheme for the 
meeting, but I always wondered why it is not that way: everyone should 
be able to join.

Alex

> 
> For planning purposes, I’m spending too much time asking people
> whether they’ll come, and this would take out some of the guesswork.
> 
> (Of course, some are speculating that the corporate ban will still be
> lifted…  Not much time left, but it would be nice if the reverse
> transition were possible without incurring additional cost.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>