IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 23 June 2008 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283373A6835; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737D93A67B2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.797, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pq9bDqbi7xHx for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com (woodstock.binhost.com [8.8.40.152]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DF0D33A6835 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17811 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jun 2008 21:35:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com) (72.66.14.12) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2008 21:35:37 -0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:11:32 -0400
To: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
In-Reply-To: <698F71BEE6ECCFF2C1348D8F@p3.JCK.COM>
References: <8832006D4D21836CBE6DB469@klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch.net> <485590E2.3080107@gmail.com> <p06250116c47c330c7dd0@[75.145.176.242]> <4856DE3A.3090804@gmail.com> <C122F91B-59B0-49AC-ABBC-6752217C4E47@NOKIA.COM> <20080619024147.9146C3A6938@core3.amsl.com> <485A353B.30403@dcrocker.net> <20080619175645.0CA443A68C2@core3.amsl.com> <485FCAAF.9070808@dcrocker.net> <20080623195128.419ED3A694C@core3.amsl.com> <698F71BEE6ECCFF2C1348D8F@p3.JCK.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20080623213544.DF0D33A6835@core3.amsl.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

John:

>Russ, that note was sent to the mailing list after I received
>your "change the document or appeal" note.   I believed that
>note from you closed the door on any further dialogue with you
>(or the IESG).  The note to the SMTP list was simply to collect
>opinions on which of the two choices you gave me to adopt.
>
>If you intended the "change the document or appeal" note to be
>interpreted in any other way, I apologize for not copying you on
>the question to the list, but I really could not figure out any
>other way to read it (and cannot to this day).

That was in response you your note that said I needed to change my 
position from DISCUSS to COMMENT or you would appeal.  I was simply 
confirming the position that we had reached.  That position is now 
clear to all.

Russ 

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email