IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 13 July 2012 11:15 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330A921F85B1 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 04:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.356, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YeKAOnTmIa8i for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 04:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (cl-125.lon-03.gb.sixxs.net [IPv6:2a00:14f0:e000:7c::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A03521F85AE for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 04:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1342178171; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=fBhB75WUTIBhEyXSS6Z27GaAYKXhyRKmsqKpYJYbXaQ=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=V/IzW3C8OIIfg04Ohv3e8bT93IcYNkWlSDAOTAUtbtloc1gWLRulfpwiaBdTZ4op2jFYhw HWNV5qFqFvehkN4iLdoYCxInvitR/LiCljLFBQKv3W0+sC75m7ddRhIZ37Ol6moq6Xjf5w iyRCb1h0hltgSwh1NM1KOs14DcBCpxs=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <UAADegAkRHY2@waldorf.isode.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:16:11 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <5000037E.2060303@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:16:14 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
To: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
References: <CAF1dMVE+2_288HmqaFfqANyB1r+KzBYXQ37i0_Gm_x1w1COqVw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF1dMVE+2_288HmqaFfqANyB1r+KzBYXQ37i0_Gm_x1w1COqVw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, EAI WG <ima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:15:13 -0000

On 10/07/2012 17:13, Joseph Yee wrote:
> Questionable: RFC 3987 and RFC 6068  (used only as part of
> the specification of "the URI-encoded form" in Section 3.1).  I
> urge getting rid of them entirely since it is easy to have the
> discussion that is relevant to this document without them and
> they (especially 3987, which draft-ietf-iri-3987bis (the real
> [I-D.duerst-iri-bis] proposes to obsolete incompatibly.
Sorry, missed this earlier: all URI mentioned in the document need 
Informative references. I don't think just assuming that readers can 
find relevant documents is Ok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email