IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 13 July 2012 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0F511E80E2 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6bF+g+eVa4d for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38C511E80C7 for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6DKKhQ9005576; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1342210848; bh=uk0/Le41EsD7J11/x9L62wvRFb7lZBYuiwooIPq9dhk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=4infAw4NrJsItOiQP2ZfJzedkbdXoj00TQQqHWjsVFkkanp9TllnJ4qkOS8JoK0Uk JrCqMydmN7pM2xRRTLcPg1sHaQ9RIi0C8yigAPK7w0B1bXYnHm7ZmrGvR7sOizBieB fH2XOo9pELP+LlrMuWxHqR9xJ6t+Rl2WYgQi7R1I=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1342210848; i=@resistor.net; bh=uk0/Le41EsD7J11/x9L62wvRFb7lZBYuiwooIPq9dhk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=L7AbbTO1UhdobpGHf6k2QUcxq+YNVWOjipNLXirGxsVd9Wl3qKQXeYijzUsT3M41+ Sd2Bgy2tL5U4cvsvot1BKnMbfw9kUcv45OCr9/V34OuLN4ieWLdmdZ7vuqCuWHvVKh k7iqf8lIbx4Jn7z7iGggpQwZSbhMlxMLwREdYl/A=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120713130919.09ac4c60@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:18:59 -0700
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <50007E58.8010802@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <CAF1dMVE+2_288HmqaFfqANyB1r+KzBYXQ37i0_Gm_x1w1COqVw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207121737350.66870@joyce.lan> <5000022C.5020207@isode.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207130936460.95156@joyce.lan> <50003A2A.5080005@isode.com> <50007E58.8010802@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:20:22 -0000

At 13:00 13-07-2012, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>Hi Alexey, I noticed that all of your drafts mention the IETF, but 
>you neither define it nor reference a definition ;)

+1 :-)

>IMO mailto does not need a reference. No matter what mailto actually 
>means, the document still says the same thing.

I included a reference to "mailto" in a draft as a pointer for an 
implementer to see what's the relevant specification quickly.  I have 
heard of the thing called a search engine.  The short answer is that 
it is more of a matter of style.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email