IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02

John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> Fri, 13 July 2012 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <klensin@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BED11E80EB for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.160, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVQdG2+Ag1Ry for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8789911E80E7 for <ima@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.115] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <klensin@jck.com>) id 1Spp9s-0004qT-BF; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:20:24 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:25:35 -0400
From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Message-ID: <A96E2A28B14526336B908012@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120713124847.0bc41e50@resistor.net>
References: <CAF1dMVE+2_288HmqaFfqANyB1r+KzBYXQ37i0_Gm_x1w1COqVw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207121737350.66870@joyce.lan> <5000022C.5020207@isode.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207130936460.95156@joyce.lan> <50003A2A.5080005@isode.com> <2279587D95E0BCE4B5CDED1E@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120713124847.0bc41e50@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: EAI WG <ima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EAI] Shepherd report review of mailinglist-02
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 23:25:19 -0000

--On Friday, July 13, 2012 12:56 -0700 S Moonesamy
<sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
> At 09:04 13-07-2012, John C Klensin wrote:
>> Then, partially following John's logic, it would be as
>> reasonable (or more so) to clarify that the particular URIs
>> and references to them appear in 2369.
> 
> If I recall correctly we discussed about URIs for
> draft-moonesamy-rfc2369bis-04 [1].  Could you refresh my
> memory about what to clarify to help mailinglist-02?

As far as mailinglist-02 (or -03) is concerned, I think John L
is on the right track, I agree that we don't need references to
"IETF" or "email", that the issue has gotten down to where
"editor's discretion" sets in, and I'm willing to let him apply
that discretion.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email