Re: [Inip-discuss] Domain Names

[Eliot Lear <[e-mail]>]

Hey Gihan,

"Into the Wayback Machine, Sherman!"

Probably worth reviewing Saltzer, Shoch, et al.  See RFC 1498 as a good
starting point.

Eliot


On 12/19/15 6:16 AM, Gihan Dias wrote:
> On 15/12/19 2:35 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>> The IAB recently decided that all of the technical programs should have public, open-subscription lists, to make sure we’re getting the widest input possible on those topics if architectural interest and to support transparency in “what are the programs doing anyway?”
> Warren, Ed, Suzanne,
>
> Thanks.
>
> I read the INIP description, and my take is that the mandate of INIP is to
>
> 1. Study the current use of names and identifiers on the Internet
> (including, but not limited to the DNS)
> 2a. Identify issues with current naming systems - in particular
> incompatibilities between various systems.
> 2b. Identify gaps (e.g. bidirectional aliasing, or better protection
> for privacy, or context information such as localization or
> administrative boundaries) in the existing naming systems.
> 3. Architect a set of naming systems for the Internet (assuming that a
> single naming system will not suffice).
>
> and the purpose of this list is to discuss the issues in a broader
> audience than only the INIP members.
>
> Do we have any other documents than the INIP description
> <https://www.iab.org/activities/programs/names-and-identifiers-program/>and
> Ed's Internet Draft
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-domain-names-01> ?
>
> I will try to get my thoughts together and post something to the list.
>
> Gihan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Inip-discuss mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss